ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2018
What's the harm? Risks and benefits of evolving rule-out sepsis practices.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Antimicrobials for neonates: evaluation and prescribing practices in Australian neonatal units.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Antibiotic exposure for culture-negative early-onset sepsis in late-preterm and term newborns: an international study.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of whole blood CD64 for identifying infection in neonates receiving hospital care.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Should we give antibiotics to neonates with mild non-progressive symptoms? A comparison of serial clinical observation and the neonatal sepsis risk calculator.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Reduction of unnecessary antibiotic days in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Article
- Impact of early-onset sepsis guidelines on breastfeeding.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Application of Kaiser Sepsis Calculator in culture-positive infants with early onset sepsis.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2021Article
- Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Utilization in a Large Integrated Health Care System.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Neonate Bloodstream Infections in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries: An Update on Epidemiology and Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Management of Late Preterm and Term Neonates exposed to maternal Chorioamnionitis.BMC pediatrics · 2019Article
- Early-Onset Sepsis Risk Calculator Integration Into an Electronic Health Record in the Nursery.Pediatrics · 2019Article
- Secondary prevention of early-onset sepsis: a less invasive Italian approach for managing neonates at risk.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymptomatic term and late-preterm newborns with risk factors for early onset sepsis commonly undergo laboratory evaluation and receive empiric antibiotic therapy. Some have challenged the rationale for current "rule-out sepsis" practices, arguing that they lead to unnecessary overtreatment and healthcare costs. A series of recent clinical studies has explored scheduled serial observations as an alternative to laboratory testing and empiric antibiotics for asymptomatic newborns with historical risk factors for sepsis. These studies have shared the conclusion that serial observation is safe and cost-effective for well-appearing term and late-preterm babies, but they are also somewhat speculative because culture-proven early onset sepsis is an extremely low prevalence diagnosis. Here, we review the evolving consensus of optimal rule-out sepsis practices. We examine chorioamnionitis as an example of a problematic risk factor that has contributed to the controversy surrounding this topic. We also discuss how introduction of online sepsis risk calculators has allowed more precise delineation of a patient's chances of developing culture-proven infection. Finally, we analyze existing data from published studies to estimate the number needed to harm (NNH) when an observation-based strategy is used instead of a risk-based approach. We conclude that, if harm is defined as death or serious sepsis complications such as hemodynamic instability or neurologic injury, the NNH is 1610, compared to an NNH of 7 and 2.9 for IV infiltrates and delayed breastfeeding, respectively-two common and potentially consequential complications of NICU admission for a rule-out sepsis. We believe that the differential between risk of serious harm from observing a well-appearing term or late-preterm newborn with risk factors for sepsis and the risk of less significant but common NICU complications argues in favor of the ongoing trend toward less aggressive management of newborns with sepsis risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.