Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483356›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Temperament and brain networks of attention.

Michael I Posner, Mary K Rothbart

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Correlates of Novelty-Evoked Distress in 4-Month-Old Infants: A Synthetic Cohort Study.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing attention orienting in mice: a novel touchscreen adaptation of the Posner-style cueing task.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Toward a Revised Nosology for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Heterogeneity.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Opinion on monoaminergic contributions to traits and temperament.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael I PosnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA mposner@oregon.uoregon.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-987X
Mary K RothbartDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attention networks of the human brain are important control systems that develop from infancy into adulthood. While they are common to everyone, they differ in efficiency, forming the basis of individual differences in attention. We have developed methods for measuring the efficiency of these networks in older children and adults and have also examined their development from infancy. During infancy the alerting and orienting networks are dominant in control of the infant's actions, but later an executive network dominates. Each network has been associated with its main neuromodulator and these have led to associations with genes related to that network neuromodulator. The links between parent reports of their child's effortful control and the executive attention network allow us to associate molecular mechanisms to fundamental behavioural outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultAttentionBrainChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCuesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleNerve NetNeuropsychological Testsalertingattention networksgenetic variationneuromodulatorsorientingtemperament

Identifiers

PMID29483356
PMCPMC5832696
OpenAlexW2789591625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.