Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483355›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.

Jana Uher, Irina Trofimova, William Sulis, Petra Netter, Luiz Pessoa, Michael I Posner, Mary K Rothbart, Vladimir Rusalov, Isaac T Peterson, Louis A Schmidt

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jana UherUniversity of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, United Kingdom mail@janauher.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2450-4943
Irina TrofimovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6758-1389
William SulisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-381X
Petra NetterDepartment of Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5591-2715
Luiz PessoaDepartment of Psychology and Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-6903
Michael I PosnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Mary K RothbartDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Vladimir RusalovInstitute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Druzhinin Laboratory of Abilities, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-5299
Isaac T PetersonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-6673
Louis A SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-0664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout the last 2500 years, the classification of individual differences in healthy people and their extreme expressions in mental disorders has remained one of the most difficult challenges in science that affects our ability to explore individuals' functioning, underlying psychobiological processes and pathways of development. To facilitate analyses of the principles required for studying individual differences, this theme issue brought together prominent scholars from diverse backgrounds of which many bring unique combinations of cross-disciplinary experiences and perspectives that help establish connections and promote exchange across disciplines. This final paper presents brief commentaries of some of our authors and further scholars exchanging perspectives and reflecting on the contributions of this theme issue.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.

Indexed as

IndividualityModels, PsychologicalBrainEmotionsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, MedievalHumansInterdisciplinary ResearchMental DisordersNerve NetPsychomotor PerformancePsychophysiologyTemperamentTerminology as Topicindividual differencesneurophysiologypersonalitytaxonomic modelstemperamenttraits

Identifiers

PMID29483355
PMCPMC5832695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.