Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483338›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges.

I Trofimova, T W Robbins, W H Sulis, J Uher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding Kindness in the Russian Context.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Creative Polymathy and the COVID-19 Crisis.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Taxonomic models of individual differences: a guide to transdisciplinary approaches.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Diversity in action: exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Functionality versus dimensionality in psychological taxonomies, and a puzzle of emotional valence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I TrofimovaCILab, McMaster University, 92 Bowman St., Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8S 2T6 iratrofimov@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6758-1389
T W RobbinsUniversity of Cambridge, Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-5977
W H SulisCILab, McMaster University, 92 Bowman St., Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8S 2T6.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-381X
J UherUniversity of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London SE10 9LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2450-4943

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104631/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Editorial highlights a unique focus of this theme issue on the biological perspectives in deriving psychological taxonomies coming from neurochemistry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, genetics, psychiatry, developmental and comparative psychology-as contrasted to more common discussions of socio-cultural concepts (personality) and methods (lexical approach). It points out the importance of the distinction between temperament and personality for studies in human and animal differential psychophysiology, psychiatry and psycho-pharmacology, sport and animal practices during the past century. It also highlights the inability of common statistical methods to handle nonlinear, feedback, contingent, dynamical and multi-level relationships between psychophysiological systems of consistent psychological traits discussed in this theme issue.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.

Indexed as

IndividualityModels, PsychologicalAnimalsBiofeedback, PsychologyFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychiatryPsychometricsPsychophysiologyTemperamentfactor analysisindividual differencespersonalitytaxonomiestemperament

Identifiers

PMID29483338
PMCPMC5832678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.