Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29483078›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Point-of-care urine culture for managing urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Christopher C Butler, Nick A Francis, Emma Thomas-Jones, Mirella Longo, Mandy Wootton, Carl Llor, Paul Little, Michael Moore, Janine Bates, Timothy Pickles and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. A new point-of-care test for the rapid detection of urinary tract infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection with miniaturised point-of-care cultivation on a dipstick.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nick A FrancisDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Emma Thomas-JonesCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mirella LongoDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mandy WoottonSpecialist Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Unit, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Carl LlorPrimary Healthcare Centre, Barcelona, Spain.
Paul LittlePrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Michael MoorePrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Janine BatesCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Timothy PicklesCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Nigel KirbyCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
David GillespieCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kate RumsbyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
Curt BrugmanJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Micaela GalDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kerenza HoodCentre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Theo VerheijJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of using point-of-care (POC) urine culture in primary care on appropriate antibiotic use is unknown.

aimTo assess whether use of the Flexicult DESIGN AND

settingIndividually randomised trial of females with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) in primary care research networks (PCRNs) in England, the Netherlands, Spain, and Wales.

methodMultilevel regression compared outcomes between the two groups while controlling for clustering.

resultsIn total, 329 participants were randomised to POC testing (POCT) and 325 to standard care, and 324 and 319 analysed. Fewer females randomised to the POCT arm than those who received standard care were prescribed antibiotics at the initial consultation (267/324 [82.4%] versus 282/319 [88.4%], odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35 to 0.88). Clinicians indicated the POCT result changed their management for 190/301 (63.1%). Despite this, there was no statistically significant difference between study arms in antibiotic use that was concordant with laboratory culture results (primary outcome) at day 3 (39.3% POCT versus 44.1% standard care, OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.58 to 1.20), and there was no evidence of any differences in recovery, patient enablement, UTI recurrences, re-consultation, antibiotic resistance, and hospitalisations at follow-up. POCT culture was not cost-effective.

conclusionPoint-of-care urine culture was not effective when used mainly to adjust immediate antibiotic prescriptions. Further research should evaluate use of the test to guide initiation of 'delayed antibiotics'.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsUrineAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial drug resistancebacterial infectionscost–benefit analysisdrug resistancepoint-of-care testingurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID29483078
PMCPMC5863681
OpenAlexW2788795972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.