Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29482936›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2018

Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial.

Cindy L Amundsen, Yuko M Komesu, Christopher Chermansky, W Thomas Gregory, Deborah L Myers, Emily F Honeycutt, Sandip P Vasavada, John N Nguyen, Tracey S Wilson, Heidi S Harvie and 2 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512039 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reduced-dose onabotuLinumtoxinA for Urgency Incontinence Among Elder Females (RELIEF): A Randomized Controlled Comparative Effectiveness Trial With Embedded Qualitative and Costing Analyses

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled376ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Urinary Incontinence in Old Age, Urgency Urinary IncontinenceArmsBotox 50 Unit Injection, Botox 100 Unit Injection
NCT06226220 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Trial Time for Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Sacral Neuromodulation for Urgency Urinary Incontinence or Urgency-frequency: a Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2023 to 2026Enrolled193ConditionsUrge Incontinence, Urgency-frequency Syndrome, Overactive BladderArmsSacral neuromodulation
NCT06483217 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Optimal Injection Interval for Intra-Detrusor Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized Controlled Trial Utilizing a Patient-Centered Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New OrleansRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsOveractive Bladder, Urinary Urgency, Urinary Incontinence, Urge Urinary IncontinenceArmsPatient-directed follow up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy L AmundsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: cindy.amundsen@duke.edu.
Yuko M KomesuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Christopher ChermanskyDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
W Thomas GregoryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Deborah L MyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Emily F HoneycuttSocial, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Sandip P VasavadaDepartment of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
John N NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente San Diego, California, USA.
Tracey S WilsonDepartment of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Heidi S HarvieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dennis WallaceSocial, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
RTI International · USBrown University · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USKaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center Administrative Supplement: ODSS CDE FundingU24HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MARIE G GANTZ · 2016 to 2026
$35.8M
Pelvic floor Disorders Network-Data Coordinating CenterU01HD041249 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEI, JOHN T · 2001 to 2010
$19.8M
Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialU10HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
The Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD041250 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2015
$3.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
The Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteU10HD054215 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARBER, MATTHEW D · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
Brown/WIH Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Site (UG1)UG1HD069013 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Vivian W Sung · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Site Application: The San Diego PelvicFloor ConsortiumUG1HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EMILY S. LUKACZ, Shawn A Menefee · 2016 to 2026
$2.9M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHAFFER, JOSEPH I · 2006 to 2015
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD041249NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041250NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054136NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069013NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069025NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrgency urinary incontinence (UUI) is a chronic condition for which sacral neuromodulation (SNM) (InterStim/Medtronic) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) (BotoxA/Allergan) are utilized. These therapies have not been compared over extended time.

objectiveTo compare UUI episodes (UUIE) over 24 mo following SNM or BTX. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsMulticenter, open-label, randomized, extension trial (February 2012-July 2016) at nine US medical centers involving 386 women with ≥6 UUIE over 3 d inadequately managed by medications. Participants were clinical responders to treatment: ≥50% reduction in UUIEs after SNM placement or 1 mo post BTX.

interventionSNM (n=194) versus 200 U BTX (n=192). SNM reprogrammings occurred throughout the 24 mo. After 6 mo, two additional BTX injections were allowed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome: change in mean daily UUIE over 24 mo. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: no UUIE, ≥75% and ≥50% UUIE reduction; Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form; Urinary Distress Inventory short form; Incontinence Impact Questionnaire; Patient Global Impression of Improvement; Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire; and adverse events (AEs). Primary analysis used a linear mixed model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcome data were available for 260/298 (87%) clinical responders. No difference in decreased mean UUIE was found over 24 mo (-3.88 vs -3.50 episodes/d,95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.14-0.89; p=0.15), with no differences in UUI resolution, ≥75% or ≥50% UUIE reduction. BTX group maintained higher satisfaction (mean difference=-9.14, 95% CI=-14.38--3.90; p<0.001), treatment endorsement (mean difference=-12.16, 95% CI=-17.7--6.63; p<0.001) through 24 mo. Other secondary measures did not differ. Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) were higher after BTX (24% vs 10%; p<0.01), 6% required intermittent catheterization post second injection. SNM revision and removals occurred in 3% and 9% patients, respectively.

conclusionsBoth treatments offered sustainable UUI improvement, and higher BTX dosing had low clean intermittent catheterization rates, but with UTI risk. SNM revision/removal rates were low due to standardized lead placement with strict treatment response definitions. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared a large group of US women with severe urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) who received sacral neuromodulation (InterStim) or onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox A) therapy during a 2-yr period. We found that both therapies had similar success in reducing UUI symptoms, and adverse events were low. However, women in the BotoxA group had higher satisfaction and endorsement with their treatment, but with a higher chance of a urinary tract infection. We conclude that both therapies offer sustained reduction in daily incontinence over 2 yr.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyAgedBotulinum Toxins, Type AComparative Effectiveness ResearchElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeuromuscular AgentsSacrumTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, UrgeUrinary Tract InfectionsBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin ABotoxInterStimOnbotulinumtoxinASacral neuromodulationUrgency urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID29482936
PMCPMC6004242
OpenAlexW2787906061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.