ReviewPET clinics2018
[18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose-PET Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
Review in PET clinics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Exploratory Study of Neoadjuvant Cetuximab Followed by Cetuximab and Chemoradiotherapy in Women With Newly Diagnosed Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.American journal of clinical oncology · 2022Trial
- Prognostic value of FDG-PET SUV changes in cervical cancer following radiation therapy: a retrospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
- PET CT Imaging with FDG in the Therapeutical Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Diagnosed in a 43-Year-Old Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Application of PET/MRI in Gynecologic Malignancies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Clinical perspectives for the use of total body PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Predictive Role of MRI andCancers · 2020Article
- 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose and Its Analogs: From Diagnostic to Therapeutic Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Cervical cancer evaluated with integratedOncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides an overview of PET in cervical cancer, primarily with regard to the use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.