Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29482632›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2018

Development and differentiability of three brief interventions for risky alcohol use that include varying doses of motivational interviewing.

Jennifer E Hettema, Stephanie A Cockrell, Abigail Reeves, Karen S Ingersoll, Paula J Lum, Richard Saitz, Cristina M Murray-Krezan, Valerie A Carrejo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02978027 (Mentored Research on Improving Alcohol Brief Interventions in Medical Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02978027 nacompletednot on this map

Mentored Research on Improving Alcohol Brief Interventions in Medical Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2014 to 2017Enrolled93ConditionsAlcohol AbuseArmsBrief Advice, NIAAA Clinician's Guide, Motivational Interviewing (MI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E HettemaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. jhettema@salud.unm.edu.
Stephanie A CockrellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Abigail ReevesDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Karen S IngersollDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Paula J LumDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Richard SaitzDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Cristina M Murray-KrezanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Valerie A CarrejoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
University of New Mexico · USUniversity of Virginia · USBoston University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Mentored Research on Improving Alcohol Brief Interventions in MedicalSettingsK23AA020865 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HETTEMA, JENNIFER ELIN · 2012 to 2015
$628k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA020865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile brief intervention (BI) for risky alcohol use generally yields positive effects among those identified by screening, effect sizes are small and there is unexplained heterogeneity in outcome. The heterogeneity may be related to differences in intervention style and content, including elements of motivational interviewing (MI). To date, it has been difficult to interpret the role of MI in BI and these gaps in knowledge interfere with efforts to train, disseminate and implement BI that retains and maximizes efficacy. This study sought to develop BI protocols with varying doses of MI and test their differentiability. Differentiable BI protocols could allow for future studies that prospectively evaluate the role MI plays in affecting BI outcome.

methodsWe developed three intervention protocols: brief advice, standard BI (NIAAA Clinician's Guide), and MI-enhanced BI and administered them to 45 primary care patients who reported exceeding recommended drinking limits. We then rated the BI sessions for fidelity to the assigned protocol as well as MI consistency based on Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale scores. The differentiability of BI protocols was determined by calculating fidelity to assigned protocols and comparing MITI scores using pairwise, Tukey-adjusted comparisons of least squares mean scores.

resultsHigh rates of fidelity to each protocol were achieved. The three BI protocols were also highly differentiable based on MITI scores.

conclusionsThe three interventions can be used in future trials to prospectively examine the role MI has in determining BI outcome. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT02978027, retrospectively registered 11/28/16.

Indexed as

AlcoholismFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMotivational InterviewingPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsBrief alcohol intervention in primary careDifferentiable interventionsMotivational interviewingRisky alcohol useTreatment fidelity

Identifiers

PMID29482632
PMCPMC5828117
OpenAlexW2796459293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.