Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29482626›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2018

Alterations in sperm DNA methylation, non-coding RNA and histone retention associate with DDT-induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease.

Michael K Skinner, Millissia Ben Maamar, Ingrid Sadler-Riggleman, Daniel Beck, Eric Nilsson, Margaux McBirney, Rachel Klukovich, Yeming Xie, Chong Tang, Wei Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Small Non-coding RNAs and Male Infertility.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Environmental and Genetic Perturbations of the Sperm Epigenome.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael K SkinnerCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA. skinner@wsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8224-2078
Millissia Ben MaamarCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Ingrid Sadler-RigglemanCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Daniel BeckCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Eric NilssonCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Margaux McBirneyCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Rachel KlukovichDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.
Yeming XieDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.
Chong TangDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.
Wei YanDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.
Washington State University · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Single Cell Molecular ExpressionP30GM110767 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI SANDERS, KENTON M · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
EPIGENETIC TRANSGENERATIONAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR ACTIONSR01ES012974 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKINNER, MICHAEL K · 2005 to 2018
$4.6M
Regulation of Spermatogenesis by X-linked miRNAsR01HD060858 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI MCCARREY, JOHN R, YAN, WEI · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Messenger RNA Fate Control in SpermatogenesisR01HD085506 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI SANDERS, KENTON M · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
John Templeton Foundation 50183NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085506NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012974NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110767NIH HHS ES012974NIH HHS GM110767NIH HHS HD085506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental toxicants such as DDT have been shown to induce the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease (e.g., obesity) through the germline. The current study was designed to investigate the DDT-induced concurrent alterations of a number of different epigenetic processes including DNA methylation, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and histone retention in sperm.

methodsGestating females were exposed transiently to DDT during fetal gonadal development, and then, the directly exposed F1 generation, the directly exposed germline F2 generation and the transgenerational F3 generation sperm were investigated.

resultsDNA methylation and ncRNA were altered in each generation sperm with the direct exposure F1 and F2 generations being predominantly distinct from the F3 generation epimutations. The piRNA and small tRNA were the most predominant classes of ncRNA altered. A highly conserved set of histone retention sites were found in the control lineage generations which was not significantly altered between generations, but a large number of new histone retention sites were found only in the transgenerational generation DDT lineage sperm.

conclusionsTherefore, all three different epigenetic processes were concurrently altered as DDT induced the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of sperm epimutations. The direct exposure generations sperm epigenetic alterations were distinct from the transgenerational sperm epimutations. The genomic features and gene associations with the epimutations were investigated to help elucidate the integration of these different epigenetic processes. Observations demonstrate all three epigenetic processes are involved in transgenerational inheritance. The different epigenetic processes appear to be integrated in mediating the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance phenomenon.

Indexed as

AnimalsDatabases, GeneticDDTDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHeredityHistonesMaleModels, MolecularRatsRNA, UntranslatedSpermatozoaDDTHistonesRNA, UntranslatedDDTDisease etiologyDNA methylationEpigeneticHistoneInheritancencRNASpermTransgenerational

Identifiers

PMID29482626
PMCPMC5827984
OpenAlexW2788384886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.