Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29482622›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Structured approaches to promote patient and family engagement in treatment in acute care hospital settings: protocol for a systematic scoping review.

Donna Goodridge, Chrysanthus Henry, Erin Watson, Meghan McDonald, Lucia New, Elizabeth L Harrison, Murray Scharf, Erika Penz, Steve Campbell, Thomas Rotter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Donna GoodridgeCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. donna.goodridge@usask.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-8646
Chrysanthus HenryDepartment of Community and Population Health Studies, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Erin WatsonLeslie and Irene Dube Health Sciences Library, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Meghan McDonaldCollege of Medicine, Health Sciences Graduate Program, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Collaborative Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Saskatoon, Canada.
Lucia NewCollege of Medicine, Health Sciences Graduate Program, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Collaborative Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Saskatoon, Canada.
Elizabeth L HarrisonSchool of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Murray ScharfCollege of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Erika PenzCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Steve CampbellFaculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Thomas RotterHealthcare Quality Programs, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CASaskatchewan Polytechnic · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation 3894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile effective engagement of patients and families in treatment is increasingly viewed as a priority for many healthcare systems, much remains to be learned about the nature and outcomes of approaches that seek to accomplish this goal in the acute care hospital setting. Wide variability in the implementation of practices designed to promote patient and family engagement in hospitals has been noted. Approaches aimed at promoting patient and family engagement in treatment share the over-arching goal of changing behaviors of patients, families, and healthcare providers and possibly administrators. Behavior change techniques (BCTs) can be a key element of patient and family engagement approaches. This scoping review will contribute to the development of an evidence base detailing that the BCTs have potential to be effective in patient and family engagement interventions. The specific objectives of this review are to (a) identify and classify approaches used in acute care hospitals to engage patient and families in treatment according to the behavior change technique taxonomy; and (b) evaluate and synthesize the outcomes for these approaches for patients and families, healthcare providers, and health administrators/funders.

methodsThis systematic scoping review will allow us to determine the extent, range, and nature of research activity related to initiatives designed to promote patient and family engagement in care. A comprehensive electronic literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Studies will be included if they report on outcomes of a structured or systematic approach to the promotion of adult inpatient and family engagement in treatment in acute care settings. Studies will be selected in a two-stage screening process (title and abstract; full text) and quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Data extraction will include narrative descriptions of the intervention and classification of the behavior change techniques employed. DISCUSSION: This review aims to identify and classify the specific behavior change techniques underpinning patient and family engagement interventions used in acute care hospital settings. By identifying the "active ingredients" in these interventions, our findings will be transferable to a wide range of acute care hospital contexts and populations.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationProfessional-Family RelationsHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansInpatientsOrganizational InnovationPatient-Centered CareScoping Reviews as TopicAcute care hospitalsPatient and family-centered care: behavior change techniquesPatient and family engagement

Identifiers

PMID29482622
PMCPMC5827976
OpenAlexW2791706376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.