ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2018
Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement with a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical intradiscal pressure responses to end-range supine postures: a cadaveric investigation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Standardized Morphological Modeling and Simulation-Based Validation of a Novel Tibiotalar Fusion Implant.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The effects of Modic-III change on the osseointegration in cervical disc prosthesis: an experimental study in caprine models.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of a novel biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc in canine cervical cadaveric spines.JOR spine · 2023Article
- Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The impact of different artificial disc heights during total cervical disc replacement: an in vitro biomechanical study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost of the current available cervical disc prostheses present a flat surface instead of an arcuate surface which is most similar to the morphology of cervical endplate. Therefore, we designed a novel prosthesis (Pretic-I, Trauson) based on the physiological curvature of the cervical endplate. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement (CDR) with this novel prosthesis was performed and compared with the Prestige LP prosthesis.
methodsThree motion segments of 18 cadaveric cervical specimens (C2-C7) were evaluated with a 75 N follower load. Overall, the biomechanics of three models, intact specimen, CDR with the novel prosthesis and CDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis, were studied to gain insight into the effective function of the novel prosthesis. The range of motion (ROM) of all three segments and intradiscal pressure (IDP) on adjacent levels were measured and analysed.
resultsCompared to the intact condition, the ROM of all three segments showed no significant difference in the replacement group. Moreover, there was also no significant difference in the ROM between the two prostheses. Besides, the IDP on the cranial adjacent level showed no obvious difference between the two prostheses; nevertheless, the IDP on the caudal adjacent level of the novel prosthesis was significantly less than the Prestige LP prosthesis.
conclusionsIn summary, the novel disc prosthesis was effective to maintain the ROM at the target segment and adjacent segments. Besides, CDR with the novel prosthesis could reduce the IDP on the caudal adjacent level to a certain extent, compared with the Prestige LP prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.