Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29482548›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

An adaptable chromosome preparation methodology for use in invertebrate research organisms.

Longhua Guo, Alice Accorsi, Shuonan He, Carlos Guerrero-Hernández, Shamilene Sivagnanam, Sean McKinney, Matthew Gibson, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The genome of the colonial hydroidGenome research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Genomes of Two Strains ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Longhua GuoUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alice AccorsiStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Shuonan HeStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Carlos Guerrero-HernándezStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Shamilene SivagnanamOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sean McKinneyStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Matthew GibsonStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Alejandro Sánchez AlvaradoStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA. asa@stowers.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1966-6959
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to efficiently visualize and manipulate chromosomes is fundamental to understanding the genome architecture of organisms. Conventional chromosome preparation protocols developed for mammalian cells and those relying on species-specific conditions are not suitable for many invertebrates. Hence, a simple and inexpensive chromosome preparation protocol, adaptable to multiple invertebrate species, is needed.

resultsWe optimized a chromosome preparation protocol and applied it to several planarian species (phylum Platyhelminthes), the freshwater apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (phylum Mollusca), and the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum Cnidaria). We demonstrated that both mitotically active adult tissues and embryos can be used as sources of metaphase chromosomes, expanding the potential use of this technique to invertebrates lacking cell lines and/or with limited access to the complete life cycle. Simple hypotonic treatment with deionized water was sufficient for karyotyping; growing cells in culture was not necessary. The obtained karyotypes allowed the identification of differences in ploidy and chromosome architecture among otherwise morphologically indistinguishable organisms, as in the case of a mixed population of planarians collected in the wild. Furthermore, we showed that in all tested organisms representing three different phyla this protocol could be effectively coupled with downstream applications, such as chromosome fluorescent in situ hybridization.

conclusionsOur simple and inexpensive chromosome preparation protocol can be readily adapted to new invertebrate research organisms to accelerate the discovery of novel genomic patterns across the branches of the tree of life.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomesEmbryo, NonmammalianInvertebratesKaryotypingMolluscaPlanariansPlatyhelminthsSea AnemonesSnailsAmpullariidaeApple snailColchicineDugesia japonicaGastropodKaryogramKaryotypeNematostellaPlanarianSchmidtea mediterranea

Identifiers

PMID29482548
PMCPMC5828064
OpenAlexW2773079594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.