SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2018
Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
112 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association Between Sexting and Different Types of Sexual Violence: A Meta-Analysis.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Pooled it
- The Mental Health and Social Implications of Nonconsensual Sharing of Intimate Images on Youth: A Systematic Review.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of social processes and mechanisms in the community that influence risky sexual behaviour among adolescents and young adults.Nursing open · 2023Pooled it
- Lines of Action for Sexting Prevention and Intervention: A Systematic Review.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Socially Disadvantaged Community Structures and Conditions Negatively Influence Risky Sexual Behavior in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of public health · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of COVID-19 on Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Children: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Pornography use and sexting amongst children and young people: a systematic overview of reviews.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Demographic and Psychosocial Factors Associated With Child Sexual Exploitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- Prevalence of sending, receiving and forwarding sexts among youths: A three-level meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Is Sexting Associated with Sexual Behaviors During Adolescence? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2019Pooled it
- Multiple Forms of Sexting and Associations with Psychosocial Health in Early Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Non-consensual sexting among adolescents from ethnocultural minority backgrounds: the role of native peer pressure, self-control, and sexual preoccupation.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Sexting Profiles, Mental Health and Quality of Life in Adolescents and Emerging Adults.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2026Article
- Adolescent Sexting in Romantic Relationships and Daily Positive and Negative Affect Dynamics: A Dyadic Intensive Longitudinal Study.Computers in human behavior · 2026Article
- Preventing Sexual Violence Against Adolescent Girls: Psychometric Validation of the EDR-ESIA Screening Instrument for Early Detection of Exploitation Risk.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Active, Passive, and Non-Sexting Adolescents: Testing Deviancy and Normalcy Perspectives Across Risk-Related and Sexual Competence Variables.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- Stability of Cybergrooming Victimization Among Adolescents: A One-Year Latent Transition Analysis.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2026Article
- Youth-Produced Images Are the Majority of Child Sexual Abuse Materials: Categories of Youth and Adult Perpetrators From a Victim Based Study.Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment · 2026Article
- Development and Characteristics of Sexting from Age 14 to 18 Years in a Norwegian Birth Cohort.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- Concurrent and Longitudinal Associations Between In-Person and Online Sexual Behaviors and Sexual Subjectivity in Heterosexual, Cisgender, and Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development. Objective: To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting. Data Sources: In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records. Study Selection: Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent. Results: Among 39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2% were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) and 27.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-31.7%), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sexting method (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence of forwarding a sext without consent was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.6%), and the prevalence of having a sext forwarded without consent was 8.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-12.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.