Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29481604›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2019

Detection and accurate false discovery rate control of differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulfite sequencing.

Keegan Korthauer, Sutirtha Chakraborty, Yuval Benjamini, Rafael A Irizarry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uncovering alterations in cancer epigenetics via trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo and hidden Markov models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MidbrainbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human reproduction open · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Accumulation of Epigenetic Noise in the Aging Corneal Epithelium and Its Possible Mechanism.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keegan KorthauerDepartment of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Sutirtha ChakrabortyNovartis, Inorbit Mall Rd, Silpa Gram Craft Village, HITEC City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Yuval BenjaminiThe Statistics Department, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.
Rafael A IrizarryDepartment of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

EDAC: ENCODE Data Analysis CenterU41HG007000 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI WENG, ZHIPING · 2012 to 2016
$9.8M
Preprocessing and Analysis Tools for High-Throughput TechnologiesR01GM083084 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2007 to 2018
$4.4M
Data Analysis Tools for Emerging High-Throughput TechnologiesR35GM131802 · NIGMS · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Rafael Angel Irizarry · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
Overcoming bias and unwanted variability in next generation sequencingR01HG005220 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2010 to 2018
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005220NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007000NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083084NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent advances in sequencing technology, it is now feasible to measure DNA methylation at tens of millions of sites across the entire genome. In most applications, biologists are interested in detecting differentially methylated regions, composed of multiple sites with differing methylation levels among populations. However, current computational approaches for detecting such regions do not provide accurate statistical inference. A major challenge in reporting uncertainty is that a genome-wide scan is involved in detecting these regions, which needs to be accounted for. A further challenge is that sample sizes are limited due to the costs associated with the technology. We have developed a new approach that overcomes these challenges and assesses uncertainty for differentially methylated regions in a rigorous manner. Region-level statistics are obtained by fitting a generalized least squares regression model with a nested autoregressive correlated error structure for the effect of interest on transformed methylation proportions. We develop an inferential approach, based on a pooled null distribution, that can be implemented even when as few as two samples per population are available. Here, we demonstrate the advantages of our method using both experimental data and Monte Carlo simulation. We find that the new method improves the specificity and sensitivity of lists of regions and accurately controls the false discovery rate.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationModels, StatisticalAnimalsComputer SimulationGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNAUncertaintyBisulfite sequencingDifferential methylationFalse discovery rateGeneralized least squares

Identifiers

PMID29481604
PMCPMC6587918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.