ArticlePloS one2018
Scene and human face recognition in the central vision of patients with glaucoma.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05539508 (Role of Peripheral Vision in Scene Perception), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Role of Peripheral Vision in Scene Perception
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of predictions robustness and object-based predictions on subjective visual perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Impact of Glaucomatous Ganglion Cell Damage on Central Visual Function.Annual review of vision science · 2024Review
- MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- GABA decrease is associated with degraded neural specificity in the visual cortex of glaucoma patients.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Impact of glaucoma on the spatial frequency processing of scenes in central vision.Visual neuroscience · 2023Article
- Foveal crowding appears to be robust to normal aging and glaucoma unlike parafoveal and peripheral crowding.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Visual Tract Degradation in Bilateral Normal-Tension Glaucoma-Cortical Thickness Maps and Volumetric Study of Visual Pathway Areas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- RETRACTED: A deep facial recognition system using computational intelligent algorithms.PloS one · 2020Article
- Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020Article
- Face memory deficits in subjects with eye diseases: a comparative analysis between glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration patients from a developing country.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Observational
- Spatial correlation between localized decreases in exploratory visual search performance and areas of glaucomatous visual field loss.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) firstly mainly affects peripheral vision. Current behavioral studies support the idea that visual defects of patients with POAG extend into parts of the central visual field classified as normal by static automated perimetry analysis. This is particularly true for visual tasks involving processes of a higher level than mere detection. The purpose of this study was to assess visual abilities of POAG patients in central vision. Patients were assigned to two groups following a visual field examination (Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard test). Patients with both peripheral and central defects and patients with peripheral but no central defect, as well as age-matched controls, participated in the experiment. All participants had to perform two visual tasks where low-contrast stimuli were presented in the central 6° of the visual field. A categorization task of scene images and human face images assessed high-level visual recognition abilities. In contrast, a detection task using the same stimuli assessed low-level visual function. The difference in performance between detection and categorization revealed the cost of high-level visual processing. Compared to controls, patients with a central visual defect showed a deficit in both detection and categorization of all low-contrast images. This is consistent with the abnormal retinal sensitivity as assessed by perimetry. However, the deficit was greater for categorization than detection. Patients without a central defect showed similar performances to the controls concerning the detection and categorization of faces. However, while the detection of scene images was well-maintained, these patients showed a deficit in their categorization. This suggests that the simple loss of peripheral vision could be detrimental to scene recognition, even when the information is displayed in central vision. This study revealed subtle defects in the central visual field of POAG patients that cannot be predicted by static automated perimetry assessment using Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.