Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29481570›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Leprosy among schoolchildren in the Amazon region: A cross-sectional study of active search and possible source of infection by contact tracing.

Valderiza Lourenço Pedrosa, Luiz Claudio Dias, Enrique Galban, André Leturiondo, Jamile Palheta, Monica Santos, Milton Ozório Moraes, Carolina Talhari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pediatric Leprosy Profile in the Postelimination Era: A Study from Surabaya, Indonesia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valderiza Lourenço PedrosaDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-6116
Luiz Claudio DiasDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.
Enrique GalbanDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Facultad de Medicina Calixto García, La Habana, Cuba.
André LeturiondoDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.
Jamile PalhetaDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.
Monica SantosDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.
Milton Ozório MoraesLaboratório de Hanseníase, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina TalhariDepartamento de Ensino e Pesquisa, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high rate of leprosy cases among children under 15 years of age in Brazil indicates ongoing transmission within the community. The identification of the new leprosy cases among contacts can help identify the source of infection and interrupt the transmission chain. This study aims to determine the detection rate of previously undiagnosed cases of leprosy among schoolchildren who are under 15 years of age living in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, and their possible source of infection by contact tracing. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis was a school-based, cross-sectional study in which the identification of active leprosy cases was conducted in 277 out of 622 randomly selected public schools in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Suspected cases of leprosy were referred to the Alfredo da Matta Foundation, a reference center for leprosy in Manaus. A total of 34,547 schoolchildren were examined, and 40 new leprosy cases were diagnosed. Among new cases, 57.5% were males, and 80.0% demonstrated paucibacillary leprosy. A total of 196 of 206 registered contacts were screened, and 52.5% of the newly diagnosed children's cases had at least one positive household contact. In these contacts, grandparents (52.4%) were the most common co-prevalent cases, while 14.3% were uncles, 9.5% were parents and 9.5% were granduncles. Seven contacts (5.0%), including four siblings of child patients were newly diagnosed. Our data indicate that the prevalence is 11.58 per 10,000, which is 17 times higher than the registered rate. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests that the detection rate of leprosy among schoolchildren may have remained unchanged over the past thirty years. It also indicates that that active case finding is necessary for reaching the World Health Organization's goals of zero detection among children, especially in endemic areas where the prevalence of leprosy is obscure. Moreover, we assert that all children must have their household contacts examined in order to identify the possible source of infection and interrupt the disease's transmission. Novel strategies to reinforce contact tracing associated with large-scale strategies of chemo- and immune-prophylaxis should be expanded to prevent the perpetuation of the disease cycle.

Indexed as

Contact TracingAdolescentBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansLeprosyLeprosy, PaucibacillaryMaleMycobacterium lepraePrevalenceSchools

Identifiers

PMID29481570
PMCPMC5860795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.