Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29481101›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018

Age and sex differences in behavioral flexibility, sensitivity to reward value, and risky decision-making.

Sara R Westbrook, Emily R Hankosky, Megan R Dwyer, Joshua M Gulley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara R WestbrookDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.ORCID 0000-0003-3130-6849
Emily R HankoskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Megan R DwyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Joshua M GulleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-8791
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Mechanisms of amphetamine-induced plasticity in adolescents compared to adultsR01DA029815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Methamphetamine effects on cognition and 5-HT receptors in orbitofrontal cortexF31DA036330 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HANKOSKY, EMILY RUTH · 2014 to 2015
$86k
National Institutes of HealthNIDA NIH HHS F31 DA036330NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with adults, adolescent behavior is often characterized by reduced behavioral flexibility, increased sensitivity to reward, and increased likelihood to take risks. These traits, which have been hypothesized to confer heightened vulnerability to psychopathologies such as substance use disorders (SUDs), have been the focus of studies in laboratory animal models that seek to understand their neural underpinnings. However, rodent studies to date have typically used only males and have adopted standard methodological practices (e.g., weight loss inducing food restriction) that are likely to have a disparate impact on adolescents compared with adults. Here, we used adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats of both sexes to study instrumental behavior tasks that assess behavioral flexibility (strategy shifting and reversal learning; Experiment 1), sensitivity to reward value (outcome devaluation; Experiment 2), and risky decision making (probability discounting; Experiment 3). In Experiment 1, we found that adolescents were faster to acquire reversal learning than adults but there were no differences in strategy shifting. In Experiments 2 and 3, adolescents and adults were equally sensitive to changes in reward value and exhibited similar reductions in preference for a large reward when reinforcement probability was decreased. However, adolescents responded more efficiently and earned reinforcers at a higher rate than their same-sex, adult counterparts. Together, these findings provide only limited support for the existence of an "adolescent-typical" phenotype in Sprague-Dawley rats and instead suggest that age differences in the expression of these behaviors may depend on conditions such as pubertal status and motivational state. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

RewardRisk-TakingSex CharacteristicsAgingAnimalsConditioning, OperantDecision MakingFemaleMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyReversal LearningSexual Maturation

Identifiers

PMID29481101
PMCPMC5908747
OpenAlexW2792222156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.