Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29480960›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2018

Management of Patients With High Baseline Hip Fracture Risk by FRAX Reduces Hip Fractures-A Post Hoc Analysis of the SCOOP Study.

Eugene McCloskey, Helena Johansson, Nicholas C Harvey, Lee Shepstone, Elizabeth Lenaghan, Ric Fordham, Ian Harvey, Amanda Howe, Cyrus Cooper, Shane Clarke and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Guideline
  4. Systematic screening using FRAXOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers and solutions for global access to osteoporosis management: a Position Paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A novel hybrid deep learning framework based on biplanar X-ray radiography images for bone density prediction and classification.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  10. Osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture similarly in both sexes: the FOCUS observational study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. A study on whether deep learning models based on CT images for bone density classification and prediction can be used for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  15. Population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women - a logical step in reducing the osteoporotic fracture burden?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Osteoporosis case ascertainment strategies in European and Asian countries: a comparative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Global impact of COVID-19 on non-communicable disease management: descriptive analysis of access to FRAX fracture risk online tool for prevention of osteoporotic fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Eugene McCloskeyMellanby Centre for Bone Research, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Helena JohanssonAustralian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit and NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Lee ShepstoneNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Elizabeth LenaghanNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ric FordhamNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ian HarveyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Amanda HoweNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit and NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Shane ClarkeDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Neil GittoesCentre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Alison HeawoodBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard HollandLeicester Medical School, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Tarnya MarshallNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Terence W O'NeillArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Tim J PetersBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Niamh RedmondBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David TorgersonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
John A KanisCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, and Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
SCOOP Study Team
University of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAustralian Catholic University · AUBristol Hospital · USMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBNorwich University · USQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17702Arthritis Research UK 21231Department of Health HTA/10/33/04Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Versus Arthritis 17702Versus Arthritis 21231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Screening for Osteoporosis in Older Women for the Prevention of Fracture (SCOOP) study was a community-based screening intervention in women aged 70 to 85 years in the United Kingdom. In the screening arm, licensed osteoporosis treatments were recommended in women identified to be at high risk of hip fracture using the FRAX risk assessment tool (including bone mineral density measurement). In the control arm, standard care was provided. Screening led to a 28% reduction in hip fractures over 5 years. In this planned post hoc analysis, we wished to examine for interactions between screening effectiveness on fracture outcome (any, osteoporotic, and hip fractures) on the one hand and baseline FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture on the other. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, based on the group to which women were randomized, irrespective of whether screening was completed. Of 12,483 eligible participants, 6233 women were randomized to screening, with treatment recommended in 898 (14.4%). No evidence of an effect or interaction was observed for the outcomes of any fracture or osteoporotic fracture. In the screening arm, 54 fewer hip fractures were observed than in the control arm (164 versus 218, 2.6% versus 3.5%), and commensurate with treatment being targeted to those at highest hip fracture risk, the effect on hip fracture increased with baseline FRAX hip fracture probability (p = 0.021 for interaction); for example, at the 10th percentile of baseline FRAX hip probability (2.6%), there was no evidence that hip fractures were reduced (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 1.23), but at the 90th percentile (16.6%), there was a 33% reduction (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84). Prior fracture and parental history of hip fracture positively influenced screening effectiveness on hip fracture risk. We conclude that women at high risk of hip fracture based on FRAX probability are responsive to appropriate osteoporosis management. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningOsteoporotic FracturesProbabilityRisk FactorsFRAXHIP FRACTURE RISKOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID29480960
PMCPMC6004119
OpenAlexW2792615384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.