ArticleMedicine2018
Functional analysis of cell-free RNA using mid-trimester amniotic fluid supernatant in pregnancy with the fetal growth restriction.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The amniotic fluid cell-free transcriptome in spontaneous preterm labor.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Identification of gestational-age-dependent cell-free fetal mRNA transcriptional changes in human amniotic fluid.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Advancements in Liquid Biopsy Technologies for Non-Invasive Detection of Placental Dysfunction and Perinatal Complications: Focus on cfDNA, cfRNA, and Extracellular Vesicles.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Review
- Profiling Cytokines According to the Presence or Absence of Small-for-Gestational Age Using Amniotic Fluid Retrieved During Cesarean Section From Pregnant Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and telomere length in amniotic fluid: a causal graph analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Stretch Causes cffDNA and HMGB1-Mediated Inflammation and Cellular Stress in Human Fetal Membranes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identification of a novel gene signature in second-trimester amniotic fluid for the prediction of preterm birth.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Cultured Amniotic Fluid Cells Reveals Complex Gene Expression Alterations in Human Fetuses With Trisomy 18.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Fetal DNA Causes Sex-Specific Inflammation From Human Fetal Membranes.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- The Relationship between Telomere Length and Gestational Weight Gain: Findings from the Mamma & Bambino Cohort.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- The Amniotic Fluid Cell-Free Transcriptome Provides Novel Information about Fetal Development and Placental Cellular Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Quantifying Fetal Reprogramming for Biomarker Development in the Era of High-Throughput Sequencing.Genes · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction and monitoring of fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses has become with the use of ultrasound. However, these tools lack the fundamental evidence for the growth of fetus with FGR excluding pathogenic factors.Amniotic fluid samples were obtained from pregnant women for fetal karyotyping and genetic diagnosis at 16 to 19 weeks of gestation. For this study, 15 FGR and 9 control samples were selected, and cell-free fetal RNA was isolated from each supernatant of the amniotic fluid for microarray analysis.In this study, 411 genes were differentially expressed between the FGR and control group. Of these genes, 316 genes were up-regulated, while 95 genes were down-regulated. In terms of gene ontology, the up-regulated genes were highly related to metabolic process as well as protein synthesis, while the down-regulated genes were related to receptor activity and biological adhesion. In terms of tissue-specific expression, the up-regulated genes were involved in various organs while down-regulated genes were involved only in the brain. In terms of organ-specific expression, many genes were enriched for B-cell lymphoma, pancreas, eye, placenta, epithelium, skin, and muscle. In the functional significance of gene, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 10 (LRP10) was significantly increased (6-fold) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) was dramatically increased (17-fold) in the FGR cases.The results show that the important brain-related genes are predominantly down-regulated in the intrauterine growth restriction fetuses during the second trimester of pregnancy. This study also suggested possible genes related to fetal development such as B-cell lymphoma, LRP10, and IGF-2. To monitor the fetal development, further study may be needed to elucidate the role of the genes identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.