Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29480461›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2018

Fitness to fly in the paediatric population, how to assess and advice.

Joël Israëls, Ad F Nagelkerke, Dick G Markhorst, Marc van Heerde

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [International travels with children].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joël IsraëlsDepartment of Paediatrics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.israels@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-5828
Ad F NagelkerkeDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick G MarkhorstDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc van HeerdeDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of children on commercial aircrafts is rising steeply and poses a need for their treating physicians to be aware of the physiologic effects and risks of air travel. The most important risk factors while flying are a decrease in partial oxygen pressure, expansion of trapped air volume, low cabin humidity, immobility, recirculation of air and limited options for medical emergencies. Because on-board medical emergencies mostly concern exacerbations of chronic disease, the medical history, stability of current disease and previous flight experience should be assessed before flight. If necessary, hypoxia altitude simulation testing can be performed to simulate the effects of in-flight hypoxia. Although the literature on paediatric safety of air travel is sparse, recommendations for many different situations can be given.

conclusionWe present an overview of the most up to date recommendations to ensure the safety of children during flight. What is Known: • Around 65% of on-board medical emergencies are complications of underlying disease. • In children, the three most common emergencies during flight concern respiratory, neurological and infectious disease. What is New: • Although studies are scarce, some advices to ensure safe air travel can be given for most underlying medical conditions in children, based on physiology, studies in adults and expert opinions. • In former preterm infants without chronic lung disease, hypoxia altitude simulation testing to rule out in-flight desaturation is not recommended.

Indexed as

Air TravelAerospace MedicineAircraftAltitudeAltitude SicknessChildHumansMass ScreeningRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSafety ManagementAir travelFit to flyHypoxiaHypoxia altitude simulation testingNeonateTrapped air

Identifiers

PMID29480461
PMCPMC5899119
OpenAlexW2789791658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.