Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29480322›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2018

[Differential indication for psychotherapy in psychosis : Are there evidence-based criteria?]

S Klingberg, K Hesse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S KlingbergUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Calwer Str. 14, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. stefan.klingberg@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
K HesseUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Calwer Str. 14, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major objective of this paper is to discuss the available evidence on the question as to which patients benefit most from psychotherapy in psychotic disorders and the question of which kind of psychotherapy. From a methodological perspective, this task can be seen as the question of moderators of treatment success. To answer this question, the status of efficacy research on psychotherapeutic interventions in schizophrenia is summarized in a first step. Secondly, studies comparing different active psychotherapeutic approaches are discussed. There are no studies available on routine psychotherapeutic care. However, there appears to be a rationale for recommending a combination of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family therapy. If patients prefer other approaches or if the treatment model does not suit the patient, other approaches should be offered. There is evidence for CBT that insight into psychosis, female gender, a higher level of education, and age >21 are indicators of a better course in CBT. Overall, the options for differential indications are highly limited and considerably more research is required.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineFamily TherapyFemaleHumansMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicPrognosisPsychotherapyPsychotic DisordersAntipsychoticsCognitive behavioral therapyFamily interventionPsychoeducationSchizophrenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.