ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Pneumatic retinopexy outcomes as primary or secondary surgical option for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments meeting the PIVOT trial criteria in an eye referral center in Colombia: case series.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Pneumatic Retinopexy Preceding Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Managing Combined Retinal and Choroidal Detachment: A Retrospective Study of 64 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Article
- A Useful Method for the Practice of Pneumatic Retinopexy: Slit-Lamp Laser Photocoagulation through the Gas Bubble.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Commentary: Glaucoma drainage device and retinal detachment.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Review
- Pneumoretinopexy versus scleral buckling in retinal detachments with superior breaks: A comparative analysis of outcome and cost.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Pneumatic retinopexy: A cost-effective alternative.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) performed as a primary surgical procedure for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) or as a secondary procedure for recurrent RRD.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed case records of 54 patients (54 eyes) who underwent PR for RRD by injecting 0.3 ml of perfluoropropane (C3F8) in the vitreous cavity and cryopexy to break in the same sitting, followed by positioning.
resultsA total 54 eyes of 54 patients aged between 17 and 84 years (mean - 51.3, median - 53 years) were included in the study. Except five eyes, all had breaks in the superior quadrants. The RRD ranged from 1 quadrant to 4 quadrants. Twenty-eight eyes (51.8%) were phakic and 26 (48.1%) were pseudophakic. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 144 months. In 25 eyes (46.2%), PR was the primary intervention and was successful in 15 (60%) eyes with a significant visual improvement (P = 0.023). Twenty-nine eyes (52.7%) with failed scleral buckle or failed pars plana vitrectomy underwent PR with a success rate of 65.5% and significant visual improvement (P = 0.0017). Progression of proliferative vitreoretinopathy changes (40%) was the most common cause of failure. The success rate was higher in phakic eyes, eyes with attached macula, superior breaks, superior RRD, and RRD limited to 3 quadrants or less.
conclusionPR remains a minimally invasive procedure which can be used primarily or as a salvage procedure in failed surgery with moderately good success rate and minimal complications. One-step procedure reduces patient visits and ensures adequate treatment of the break.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.