ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Quality indicators for eye bank.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stages and costs of processing donated corneas for transplantation in eye banks: a scoping review.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Indian eye banking at crossroads: From volume to value.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) in eye bank.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Artificial cornea transplantation and visual rehabilitation: an integrative review.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2022Review
- Profile of donors and corneal tissue obtained through hospital cornea retrieval programme in a recently established eye bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Eastern India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Resuming eye bank services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experience and inferences.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Practical use of rubric for assessment of eye bank professionals for eye retrieval and its role in improving eye retrieval process in eye banks: An Indo-American experience.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Impact of quality assurance on utilization of corneal tissues in a community Eye Bank.Journal of current ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Awareness and knowledge about eye donation and the impact of counselors: A North Indian perspective.Journal of current ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Rubric for assessment of eye bank professionals for eye retrieval: A new tool and a step toward standardizing eye retrieval process.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Good quality pays rich dividends.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity.
methodsAdverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions - "result quality" and "process quality." The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011-2016.
resultsAdverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator.
conclusionThese indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.