Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29480248›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018

Quality indicators for eye bank.

Manisha Acharya, Saurabh Biswas, Animesh Das, Umang Mathur, Abhishek Dave, Ashok Singh, Suneeta Dubey

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Indian eye banking at crossroads: From volume to value.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  3. Corrective and preventive actions (CAPAs) in eye bank.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Good quality pays rich dividends.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manisha AcharyaDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh BiswasSamagra Development Associates Private Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Animesh DasDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Umang MathurDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek DaveDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ashok SinghDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Suneeta DubeyDr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital · INDelhi Development Authority · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to identify quality indicators of the eye bank and validate their effectivity.

methodsAdverse reaction rate, discard rate, protocol deviation rate, and compliance rate were defined as Quality Indicators of the eye bank. These were identified based on definition of quality that captures two dimensions - "result quality" and "process quality." The indicators were measured and tracked as part of quality assurance (QA) program of the eye bank. Regular audits were performed to validate alignment of standard operating procedures (SOP) with regulatory and surgeon acceptance standards and alignment of activities performed in the eye bank with the SOP. Prospective study of the indicators was performed by comparing their observed values over the period 2011-2016.

resultsAdverse reaction rate decreased more than 8-fold (from 0.61% to 0.07%), discard rate decreased and stabilized at 30%, protocol deviation rate decreased from 1.05% to 0.08%, and compliance rate reported by annual quality audits improved from 59% to 96% at the same time. In effect, adverse reaction rate, discard rate, and protocol deviation rate were leading indicators, and compliance rate was the trailing indicator.

conclusionThese indicators fulfill an important gap in available literature on QA in eye banking. There are two ways in which these findings can be meaningful. First, eye banks which are new to quality measurement can adopt these indicators. Second, eye banks which are already deeply engaged in quality improvement can test these indicators in their eye bank, thereby incorporating them widely and improving them over time.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareEye BanksHumansIndiaProspective StudiesQuality Indicators, Health CareStandard of CareEye bankquality assurancequality indicator

Identifiers

PMID29480248
PMCPMC5859592
OpenAlexW2974747991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.