Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29480019›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2018

Diagnostic validity of CT to assess degenerative temporomandibular joint disease: a systematic review.

Priscila Brenner Hilgenberg-Sydney, Danielle Veiga Bonotto, José Stechman-Neto, Liete Figueiredo Zwir, Camila Pachêco-Pereira, Graziela De Luca Canto, André Luís Porporatti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priscila Brenner Hilgenberg-Sydney1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil.
Danielle Veiga Bonotto1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil.
José Stechman-Neto2 Department of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil.
Liete Figueiredo Zwir3 Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Sao Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
Camila Pachêco-Pereira4 School of Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada.
Graziela De Luca Canto5 Department of Dentistry, Brazilian Centre for Evidence Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis , Brazil.
André Luís Porporatti5 Department of Dentistry, Brazilian Centre for Evidence Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina , Florianópolis , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to answer the focus question: "In subjects with degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), what is the diagnostic validity of CT or cone-beam CT (CBCT) compared with clinical protocols"?

methodsDJD should be assessed through clinical diagnosis according to RDC/TMD or DC/TMD. Search strategies were specifically developed to the following electronic databases: Cochrane, Latin American And Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), PubMed (including Medline), Scopus and Web of Science. Furthermore, partial grey literature search through Google Scholar, OpenGrey and ProQuest was performed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the second version of Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2).

resultsThe databases search revealed 454 records. After applying the eligibility criteria, four studies were included in this review. All studies were methodologically acceptable, although none of the them fulfilled all criteria of risk of bias according to QUADAS-2. Despite there were some high values for sensitivity and specificity, they were not homogeneous between studies. Regarding specificity outcomes, there were three studies with poor values and only one considered as excellent.

conclusionsCBCT could be a good image to evaluate DJD progression over time, but should not be used as a screening tool in healthy individuals.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCone-Beam Computed TomographyDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based DentistryHumansTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29480019
PMCPMC6196046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.