Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29479857›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Establishment and validation of a two-step screening scheme for improved performance of serological screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Tingdong Li, Xiaoyi Guo, Mingfang Ji, Fugui Li, Han Wang, Weimin Cheng, Honglin Chen, Munhon Ng, Shengxiang Ge, Yong Yuan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circulating Antibodies against Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and p53 in EBV-Positive and -Negative Gastric Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tingdong LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0685-2549
Xiaoyi GuoState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Mingfang JiCancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Fugui LiCancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Han WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Weimin ChengCancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Honglin ChenState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Li Ka Shing, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Munhon NgState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shengxiang GeState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yong YuanCancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Ningshao XiaState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health and School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiamen University · CNZhongshan People's Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which is closely associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), is one of the most prevalent cancers in southeast China. Most NPC patients are diagnosed at late stage due to inconspicuous symptoms at the early stage, and the prognosis of these patients is poor. The early diagnosis rate of NPC could be significantly increased by serological screening, but the positive predictive value (PPV) is relatively low. A simple two-step serological screening scheme was established to improve the PPV of the screening strategy and was validated by a prospective cohort. Serum antibodies specific for EBNA1, Zta, Thymidine Kinase (TK), EAD, EAR, and VCA were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The combination of EBNA1/IgA and VCA/IgA was used in the first step of screening, and anti-early antigens (EAs) were used in the second step of screening. EAD/IgA was the most prominent marker in the second step of screening, and other anti-EAs were complementary to EAD/IgA. As validated by a prospective cohort including 4200 participants, using the combination of EAD/IgA and TK/IgA in the second step decreased the number of high-risk participants from 128 to 27, and increased the PPV from 4.69% to 18.52%, with only one very early-stage case missed. The two-step screening scheme provides a standardized approach for NPC screening with an improved PPV and may be used in future field studies. With this two-step serological screening method, more people benefit from the screening program without increasing the need for fiberoptic endoscopy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBiomarkersBiopsyHumansImmunoglobulin AMass ScreeningNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPopulation SurveillanceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveSerologic TestsAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersImmunoglobulin ABinary logistic regressionEpstein-Barr virusnasopharyngeal cancerpositive predictive valuerisk of NPCserological screening

Identifiers

PMID29479857
PMCPMC5911604
OpenAlexW2790021828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.