ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2018
Clinical testing of
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness of hereditary breast cancer and readiness for genetic testing among newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer in Nigeria: a multicentre study.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Domain-Specific Computational, Functional and Structural Methods Enable Interpretation ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026Review
- Genetics services in Latin America: a descriptive study of availability and utilization of genetics in healthcare.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Knowledge and perceptions of genetic testing for patients with breast cancer in Nigeria: a survey of healthcare providers.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2025Article
- DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in Canada.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Assessment ofJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Breast Cancer Care in Low-Resourced Countries, Jordan as An Example.Cancers · 2024Review
- Gene-specific machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of rare BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Canine as a Comparative and Translational Model for Human Mammary Tumor.Journal of breast cancer · 2023Review
- Germline BRCA testing in pancreatic cancer: improving awareness, timing, turnaround, and uptake.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- Targeting theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Global Oncology Medical Diplomacy Working Group Inaugural Meeting: Defining Worldwide Barriers to Germline Genomics in Cancer Prevention and Management.Annals of global health · 2023Article
- Challenges in next generation sequencing of homology recombination repair genomic variants in prostate cancer: A nationwide survey and calibration project in China.Prostate international · 2022Article
- Cell-type-specific epigenomic variations associated withNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- BRCA1 and Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Review
- A DNA Damage Response Gene Panel for Different Histologic Types of Epithelial Ovarian Carcinomas and Their Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical testing of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.