Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29479466›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2018

Together Eating & Activity Matters (TEAM): results of a pilot randomized-clinical trial of a spousal support weight loss intervention for Black men.

C L Alick, C Samuel-Hodge, D Ward, A Ammerman, C Rini, D F Tate

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02458053 (Testing the Efficacy of a Spousal Support Enhanced Weight Loss Program on Weight Loss Among African American Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02458053 nacompletednot on this map

Testing the Efficacy of a Spousal Support Enhanced Weight Loss Program on Weight Loss Among African American Men

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2016 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsOverweight, Weight Loss, ObeseArmsAttends with partner, Couples Skill Training, Face to face group sessions, Self Monitor, Notebook
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review examining socioeconomic factors in trials of interventions for men that report weight as an outcome.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Motivating Weight Loss Among Black Adults in Relationships: Recommendations for Weight Loss Interventions.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C L AlickDepartment of Nutrition UNC Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
C Samuel-HodgeDepartment of Nutrition UNC Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
D WardDepartment of Nutrition UNC Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
A AmmermanDepartment of Nutrition UNC Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
C RiniHackensack University Medical Center Hackensack NJ USA.
D F TateDepartment of Nutrition UNC Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
University of North Carolina Health Care · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USHackensack University Medical Center · US

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, participation, preliminary efficacy and retention in a couples-based weight loss intervention among Black men. Design setting participants: Two-arm pilot randomized clinical trial in an academic clinical setting. Forty self-identified Black men and their female cohabitating partners (n = 80) aged 18 to 65 years with body mass index from 25 to 45 kg/m Intervention: Participants were randomized to a standard behavioural weight loss (Standard) programme or the Standard programme plus partner involvement (Enhanced). Both interventions focused on calorie reduction, physical activity and self-monitoring to facilitate weight loss. Enhanced included couples skills training and couple's communication components. Main outcome and measures: Changes in weight from baseline to 3 months among men. Partner weight loss (secondary). Results: Forty Black couples (men mean [SD] age, 47.4[11] years; body mass index, 35.0[6.1]), were recruited. Retention was 100% of the men and 98% of female partners. Attendance at group sessions was 63-73%. Between groups, mean (SD) weight changes among men were -3.4[.04] and -4.7[5.9] kg (p = 0.57) and among women -0.23[4.46] and -2.47[3.62] kg (p = 0.09), in the standard and enhanced groups. Conclusions: Weight losses from an intervention enhanced by partner involvement and an intervention with no partner involvement were not different. Treatment choice can be based on preference rather than outcome as both treatments are effective in producing clinically significant percent weight loss.Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT02458053.

Indexed as

African AmericansMaleSocial supportWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID29479466
PMCPMC5818757
OpenAlexW2771343199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.