Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29479327›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Type D Personality and Alexithymia: Common Characteristics of Two Different Constructs. Implications for Research and Clinical Practice.

Maria S Epifanio, Sonia Ingoglia, Pietro Alfano, Gianluca Lo Coco, Sabina La Grutta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria S EpifanioDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sonia IngogliaDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Pietro AlfanoConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca Lo CocoDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sabina La GruttaDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITIstituto di Biomedicina e di Immunologia Molecolare Alberto Monroy · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, particular attention has been paid to the role of personality specific traits that can affect the loss of health, i.e., Type D personality and Alexithymia. They have been conceptualized in a different period, this means that they are different both for their theoretical positions and their empirical studies. Some authors have speculated that there is a potential conceptual overlap between Type D personality and alexithymia constructs but there is a shortcoming in the literature. The aim of the study was to examine the potential overlap between the constructs of type D personality and alexithymia, replicating previous two studies, to extend these findings to Italian population. The participants were 247 Italian adults (males = 43%), recruited in primary health care practices of Palermo. All participants did not have chronic diseases during tests administration. They ranged in age from 35 to 69 years old (

Indexed as

alexithymiaDS-14psychosocial risk factorsTAS-20type-D personality

Identifiers

PMID29479327
PMCPMC5811501
OpenAlexW2789775636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.