Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29479003›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2018

Recent Improvement in the Long-term Survival of Breast Cancer Patients by Age and Stage in Japan.

Akiyo Yoshimura, Hidemi Ito, Yoshikazu Nishino, Masakazu Hattori, Tomohiro Matsuda, Isao Miyashiro, Tomio Nakayama, Hiroji Iwata, Keitaro Matsuo, Hideo Tanaka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The effect of a group cognitive behavioral therapy on the quality of life and emotional disturbance of women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Akiyo YoshimuraDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Research Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-9158
Hidemi ItoDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Research Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-4581
Yoshikazu NishinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Kanazawa Medical University.
Masakazu HattoriDepartment of Cancer Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital.
Tomohiro MatsudaCancer Information Services and Surveillance Division, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center.
Isao MiyashiroDepartment of Cancer Strategy, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Tomio NakayamaDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital.
Keitaro MatsuoDivision of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Research Institute.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1761-6314
Hideo TanakaDivision of Epidemiology & Prevention, Aichi Cancer Research Institute.
Yuri ItoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPCancer Services · USFukui Prefectural Hospital · JPKanazawa Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent improvements in 5-year survival of breast cancer have been reported in Japan and other countries. Though the number of long-term breast cancer survivors has been increasing, recent improvements in 10-year survival have not been reported. Moreover, the degree of improvement according to age and disease stage remains unclear.

methodsWe calculated long-term survival using data on breast cancer diagnosed from 1993 through 2006 from six prefectural population-based cancer registries in Japan. The recent increase in 10-year relative survival was assessed by comparing the results of period analysis in 2002-2006 with the results of cohort analysis in 1993-1997. We also conducted stratified analyses by age group (15-34, 35-49, 50-69, and 70-99 years) and disease stage (localized, regional, and distant).

resultsA total of 63,348 patients were analysed. Ten-year relative survival improved by 2.4% (76.9% vs 79.3%) from 1993 through 2006. By age and stage, 10-year relative survival clearly improved in the age 35-49 years (+2.9%; 78.1% vs 81.0%), 50-69 years (+2.8%; 75.2% vs 78.0%) and regional disease (+3.4%; 64.9% vs 68.3%). In contrast, the degree of improvement was small in the age 15-34 years (+0.1%; 68.2% vs 68.3%), 70-99 years (+1.0%; 87.6% vs 88.6%), localized disease (+1.1%; 92.6% vs 93.7%) and distant metastasis (+0.9%; 13.8% vs 14.7%).

conclusionsThese population-based cancer registry data show that 10-year relative survival improved 2.4% over this period in Japan. By age and stage, improvement in the age 15-34 years and distant metastasis was very small, which suggests the need for new therapeutic strategies in these patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSurvival AnalysisYoung Adultbreast cancercancer registrationlong-term survivalperiod analysisrelative survival

Identifiers

PMID29479003
PMCPMC6143379
OpenAlexW2791240022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.