Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29478257›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2018

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone vs thalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Shinsuke Iida, Masashi Wakabayashi, Kunihiro Tsukasaki, Kenichi Miyamoto, Dai Maruyama, Kazuhito Yamamoto, Yoshifusa Takatsuka, Shigeru Kusumoto, Junya Kuroda, Kiyoshi Ando and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Lenalidomide use in multiple myeloma (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

Shinsuke IidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-960X
Masashi WakabayashiJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiro TsukasakiDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kenichi MiyamotoJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Dai MaruyamaDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-6920
Kazuhito YamamotoDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshifusa TakatsukaDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shigeru KusumotoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Junya KurodaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiyoshi AndoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Tokai University of School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Yoshitaka KikukawaDepartment of Hematology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yasufumi MasakiDepartment of Hematology and Immunology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Japan.
Miki KobayashiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ichiro HanamuraDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Hiroaki AsaiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
Hirokazu NagaiDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuyuki ShimadaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Norifumi TsukamotoOncology Center, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Yoshiko InoueDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kensei TobinaiDepartment of Hematology, Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-LSG), National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization · JPNagoya City University Hospital · JPPediatric Oncology Group · CAAichi Cancer Center · JPAichi Medical University · JPEhime University Hospital · JPImamura Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPKanazawa Medical University · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized phase II selection design study (JCOG0904) was carried out to evaluate the more promising regimen between bortezomib (Bor) plus dexamethasone (Dex; BD) and thalidomide (Thal) plus Dex (TD) in Bor and Thal-naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients ≥20 and <80 years old with a documented diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who received one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive BD (Bor 1.3 mg/m

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibDexamethasoneDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaRecurrenceThalidomideBortezomibDexamethasoneThalidomidebortezomibdexamethasonerandomized phase II studyrelapsed or refractory multiple myelomathalidomide

Identifiers

PMID29478257
PMCPMC5980148
OpenAlexW2790257752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.