Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29478173›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2018

Retrospective review of Arctic Front Advance Cryoballoon Ablation: a multicenter examination of second-generation cryoballoon (RADICOOL trial).

Wilber Su, G Joseph Orme, Robert Hoyt, James Baker, Steven Compton, Christopher Fellows, John Harding, J Thomas Svinarich, Marcin Kowalski, Bryan Piedad and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation single-shot devices: not all the same?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Wilber SuHeart Institute, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, 755 E. McDowell Rd, 4th Floor, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, USA. wilber.su@bannerhealth.com.
G Joseph OrmeHeart Institute, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, 755 E. McDowell Rd, 4th Floor, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, USA.
Robert HoytIowa Heart Center Institute, Des Moines, IA, USA.
James BakerSaint Thomas Heart, Nashville, TN, USA.
Steven ComptonAlaska Heart Institute, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Christopher FellowsVirginia Mason, Seattle, WA, USA.
John HardingDoylestown Cardiology Associates, Doylestown, PA, USA.
J Thomas SvinarichColorado Heart & Vascular, Denver, CO, USA.
Marcin KowalskiStaten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health System, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Bryan PiedadWellstar Health System, Marietta, GA, USA.
David KenigsbergFlorida Heart Rhythm Specialists, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
John SegerHouston Electrophysiology Associates, Houston, TX, USA.
Zeshan K AhmadHeart Institute, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, 755 E. McDowell Rd, 4th Floor, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, USA.
Paul WangStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Banner Health · USAlaska Heart and Vascular Institute · USBanner - University Medical Center Phoenix · USDoylestown Hospital · USHeart Rhythm Society · USHouston Eye Associates · USNorthwell Health · USPalo Alto University · USSaint Thomas West Hospital · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · USWellStar Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via catheter ablation is an approved therapy for patients with drug-refractory and symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Furthermore, cryoballoon is now considered to be as effective as focal radiofrequency catheter ablation. This study examines the second-generation cryoballoon performance in a US multicenter review of real-world practices.

methodsBy retrospective chart collections, the long-term efficacy and safety of the cryoballoon procedure were assessed in 15 US centers. All patients had a history of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal AF and were treated with a cryoballoon PVI strategy at the index ablation.

resultsFour hundred fifty-two patients were evaluated, and acute PVI was achieved in 99% of patients by cryoballoon catheter ablation. In 0.88% of patients (4/452), an additional focal ablation catheter was used to achieve acute PVI during the ablation procedure. Average procedure time was 128 (range 82 to 260) min, using an average of 17 (range 1 to 19) min of fluoroscopy. The most frequent adverse event was transient phrenic nerve injury (1.5%; 7/452 patients) which all resolved by the end of the procedure with no diaphragmatic dysfunction at discharge. There were no strokes, transient ischemic attacks, cardiac tamponade, atrioesophageal fistulas, or deaths during the study. At the 12-month efficacy endpoint, single-procedure success of freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 87% (393/452 patients).

conclusionsThis real-world examination of the US practice demonstrates that second-generation cryoballoon ablation by PVI strategy is safe and effective among patients with paroxysmal AF.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCohort StudiesCryosurgeryElectrocardiographyEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient SafetyAtrial fibrillationCryoballoonPulmonary vein isolationSecond-generation cryoballoon

Identifiers

PMID29478173
OpenAlexW2790150917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.