ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018
Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized clinical trial comparing internal and external pessaries in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women: A pilot study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Trial
- ESTROgen use for complications in women treating pelvic organ prolapse with vaginal PESSaries (ESTRO-PESS)-a randomized clinical trial.International urogynecology journal · 2021Trial
- Global Engagement with an Educational Video on Vaginal Pessaries: A 9-Year Mixed-Methods Analysis of YouTube Analytics and User Comments.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Primary Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Aged Over 80 Years: Pessary Versus Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Updates in Pessary Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 3 Committee 1 - Pessary Management.International urogynecology journal · 2025Review
- Predictors for long-term adherence to vaginal pessary in pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study.International urogynecology journal · 2022Observational
- Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Indian Contribution.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021Review
- Effectiveness of ring pessaries versus vaginal hysterectomy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. A cohort study.International urogynecology journal · 2019Observational
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThere is considerable variation in the clinical management of pessaries. This study was aimed at exploring the efficacy of the continuous use of ring pessaries without support for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women.
methodsWe conducted this prospective study of fitted pessaries between January 2013 and June 2015 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Macarena Hospital, Seville University, Spain. A total of 171 nonhysterectomized postmenopausal patients with symptomatic POP (stages III and IV) were counseled for two treatment options: either surgery or vaginal pessary. A total of 94 patients who agreed to use the vaginal ring pessary were included. A successful fitting was defined as the continued use of the device until the end of the study (a median 27-month follow-up). The data were analyzed with continuity correction tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Fisher's exact test.
resultsPessary use was continued by 80.8% of the patients. Most discontinuations (50.0%) occurred within the first week after device insertion. The adverse events rate was 31.6%, and all adverse events were Clavien-Dindo grade I. The complications were extrusion of the pessary (18.4%), bleeding or excoriation (10.5%), and pain or vaginal discharge (2.6%). No major complications occurred.
conclusionsThe ring pessary without support was successfully fitted in patients with advanced POP, resulting in a high success rate. There were few side effects and complications associated with continuous use of this pessary without periodic removal or replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.