Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29478114›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018

Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.

José Luis Dueñas, Alessio Miceli

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Indian Contribution.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Luis DueñasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, School of Medicine, Seville University, Seville, Spain. jlduenas@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-6289
Alessio MiceliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, School of Medicine, Seville University, Seville, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThere is considerable variation in the clinical management of pessaries. This study was aimed at exploring the efficacy of the continuous use of ring pessaries without support for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women.

methodsWe conducted this prospective study of fitted pessaries between January 2013 and June 2015 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Macarena Hospital, Seville University, Spain. A total of 171 nonhysterectomized postmenopausal patients with symptomatic POP (stages III and IV) were counseled for two treatment options: either surgery or vaginal pessary. A total of 94 patients who agreed to use the vaginal ring pessary were included. A successful fitting was defined as the continued use of the device until the end of the study (a median 27-month follow-up). The data were analyzed with continuity correction tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Fisher's exact test.

resultsPessary use was continued by 80.8% of the patients. Most discontinuations (50.0%) occurred within the first week after device insertion. The adverse events rate was 31.6%, and all adverse events were Clavien-Dindo grade I. The complications were extrusion of the pessary (18.4%), bleeding or excoriation (10.5%), and pain or vaginal discharge (2.6%). No major complications occurred.

conclusionsThe ring pessary without support was successfully fitted in patients with advanced POP, resulting in a high success rate. There were few side effects and complications associated with continuous use of this pessary without periodic removal or replacement.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemalePessariesPostmenopauseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSpainTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVaginaAdvanced pelvic organ prolapseAdverse eventsContinuous useEfficacyRing pessary without support

Identifiers

PMID29478114
OpenAlexW2789305416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.