Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29478082›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Japanese multicenter database of healthy controls for [

Hiroshi Matsuda, Miho Murata, Yohei Mukai, Kazuya Sako, Hidetoshi Ono, Hiroshi Toyama, Yoshitaka Inui, Yasuyuki Taki, Hideo Shimomura, Hiroshi Nagayama and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pupillary responses to the glare illusion in normal pressure hydrocephalus: insights into network dysfunction and neurodegenerative comorbidities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. When Age Is More Than a Number: Acceleration of Brain Aging in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Hiroshi MatsudaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan. matsudah@ncnp.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-9897
Miho MurataDepartment of Neurology, National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei MukaiDepartment of Neurology, National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuya SakoDepartment of Neurology, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidetoshi OnoDepartment of Radiology, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi ToyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Yoshitaka InuiDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Yasuyuki TakiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hideo ShimomuraDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroshi NagayamaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Amane TatenoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro OnoDepartment of Neurology, Showa University, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidetomo MurakamiDepartment of Neurology, Showa University, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi KonoDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeki HiranoDepartment of Neurology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Satoshi KuwabaraDepartment of Neurology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Norihide MaikusaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Masayo OgawaIntegrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Etsuko ImabayashiIntegrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Noriko SatoDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Harumasa TakanoIntegrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8551, Japan.
Jun HatazawaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Ryosuke TakahashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this multicenter trial was to generate a [

methodsThis study included 510 sets of SPECT data from 256 healthy controls (116 men and 140 women; age range, 30-83 years) acquired from eight different centers. Images were reconstructed without attenuation or scatter correction (NOACNOSC), with only attenuation correction using the Chang method (ChangACNOSC) or X-ray CT (CTACNOSC), and with both scatter and attenuation correction using the Chang method (ChangACSC) or X-ray CT (CTACSC). These SPECT images were analyzed using the Southampton method. The outcome measure was the specific binding ratio (SBR) in the striatum. These striatal SBRs were calibrated from prior experiments using a striatal phantom.

resultsThe original SBRs gradually decreased in the order of ChangACSC, CTACSC, ChangACNOSC, CTACNOSC, and NOACNOSC. The SBRs for NOACNOSC were 46% lower than those for ChangACSC. In contrast, the calibrated SBRs were almost equal under no scatter correction (NOSC) conditions. A significant effect of age was found, with an SBR decline rate of 6.3% per decade. In the 30-39 age group, SBRs were 12.2% higher in women than in men, but this increase declined with age and was absent in the 70-79 age group.

conclusionsThis study provided a large-scale quantitative database of [

Indexed as

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, Imaging2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneTropanes[123I]FP-CITDopamine transporterMulticenter trialNormal databaseSPECT

Identifiers

PMID29478082
PMCPMC5993845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.