Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29477776›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2018

The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.

Michael Inzlicht, Amitai Shenhav, Christopher Y Olivola

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06691490 (Functional MRI Protocols for Studying the Neural Correlates of Effort Perception and the Effects of Targeted rTMS Protocols on Perceived Effort and Effort-based Decision-making), which is not on this map. Cited by 210 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06691490 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Functional MRI Protocols for Studying the Neural Correlates of Effort Perception and the Effects of Targeted rTMS Protocols on Perceived Effort and Effort-based Decision-making

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsfMRI Research, Transcranial Magnetic Stimilation, EEG Brain Oscillations, Motor TaskArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effort, timing and choice: a refined rodent effort choice task with excellent sensitivity to dopamine modulators.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Interest and effort in learning and performance.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael InzlichtDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada; Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 105 St. George Street, Ontario M56 3E6, Canada. Electronic address: michael.inzlicht@utoronto.ca.
Amitai ShenhavDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Christopher Y OlivolaTepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

The neural basis of sequential control in human and non-human primatesP20GM103645 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WORDEN, MICHAEL S · 2013 to 2022
$22.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to prominent models in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and economics, effort (be it physical or mental) is costly: when given a choice, humans and non-human animals alike tend to avoid effort. Here, we suggest that the opposite is also true and review extensive evidence that effort can also add value. Not only can the same outcomes be more rewarding if we apply more (not less) effort, sometimes we select options precisely because they require effort. Given the increasing recognition of effort's role in motivation, cognitive control, and value-based decision-making, considering this neglected side of effort will not only improve formal computational models, but also provide clues about how to promote sustained mental effort across time.

Indexed as

MotivationPsychological TheoryVolitionAnimalsHumanscognitive controlcognitive dissonancedecision-makingeffortlearned industriousnessneed for cognitionvalue

Identifiers

PMID29477776
PMCPMC6172040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.