Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29477775›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2018

Clarifying the Conceptualization, Dimensionality, and Structure of Emotion: Response to Barrett and Colleagues.

Alan S Cowen, Dacher Keltner

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transition dynamics shape mental state concepts.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What music makes us feel: At least 13 dimensions organize subjective experiences associated with music across different cultures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mapping the Passions: Toward a High-Dimensional Taxonomy of Emotional Experience and Expression.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan S CowenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: alan.cowen@berkeley.edu.
Dacher KeltnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM IN AFFECTIVE SCIENCET32MH020006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, JOHNSON, SHERI L · 1998 to 2018
$5.9M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a mathematically based framework distinguishing the dimensionality, structure, and conceptualization of emotion-related responses. Our recent findings indicate that reported emotional experience is high-dimensional, involves gradients between categories traditionally thought of as discrete (e.g., 'fear', 'disgust'), and cannot be reduced to widely used domain-general scales (valence, arousal, etc.). In light of our conceptual framework and findings, we address potential methodological and conceptual confusions in Barrett and colleagues' commentary on our work.

Indexed as

EmotionsSelf ReportArousalConcept FormationFeardimensionaldiscreteemotionexperienceself-reportstructure

Identifiers

PMID29477775
PMCPMC5866789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.