Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29477609›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2018

Learning what to expect and when to expect it involves dissociable neural systems.

Andrew R Delamater, Brandon Chen, Helen Nasser, Karim Elayouby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew R DelamaterBrooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States. Electronic address: andrewd@brooklyn.cuny.edu.
Brandon ChenBrooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.
Helen NasserBrooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.
Karim ElayoubyBrooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, United States.

Funding

A Multi-Component Approach to Extinction in Pavlovian LearningSC1DA034995 · NIDA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI DELAMATER, ANDREW · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA034995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two experiments with Long-Evans rats examined the potential independence of learning about different features of food reward, namely, "what" reward is to be expected and "when" it will occur. This was examined by investigating the effects of selective reward devaluation upon responding in an instrumental peak timing task in Experiment 1 and by exploring the effects of pre-training lesions targeting the basolateral amygdala (BLA) upon the selective reward devaluation effect and interval timing in a Pavlovian peak timing task in Experiment 2. In both tasks, two stimuli, each 60 s long, signaled that qualitatively distinct rewards (different flavored food pellets) could occur after 20 s. Responding on non-rewarded probe trials displayed the characteristic peak timing function with mean responding gradually increasing and peaking at approximately 20 s before more gradually declining thereafter. One of the rewards was then independently paired repeatedly with LiCl injections in order to devalue it whereas the other reward was unpaired with these injections. In a final set of test sessions in which both stimuli were presented without rewards, it was observed that responding was selectively reduced in the presence of the stimulus signaling the devalued reward compared to the stimulus signaling the still valued reward. Moreover, the timing function was mostly unaltered by this devaluation manipulation. Experiment 2 showed that pre-training BLA lesions abolished this selective reward devaluation effect, but it had no impact on peak timing functions shown by the two stimuli. It appears from these data that learning about "what" and "when" features of reward may entail separate underlying neural systems.

Indexed as

RewardAmygdalaAnimalsConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleMaleNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Long-EvansReinforcement ScheduleAmygdalaInterval timingPeak procedureReward devaluationReward processing

Identifiers

PMID29477609
PMCPMC6087496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.