Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29477442›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

An fMRI study of coherent visual motion processing in children and adults.

C M Taylor, O A Olulade, M M Luetje, G F Eden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C M TaylorCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
O A OluladeCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
M M LuetjeCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
G F EdenCenter for the Study of Learning, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: edeng@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

NEUROIMAGING COREP30HD040677 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCCARTER, ROBERT JAMES · 2001 to 2015
$15.9M
Reading and sensorimotor fluency in dyslexiaP50HD040095 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, GUINEVERE F. · 2001 to 2006
$7.5M
Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
A Comparison of the Neuro-developmental Basis of Reading in Two Writing SystemsR01HD056107 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, GUINEVERE F. · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD040677NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD040095NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056107NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large corpus of brain imaging studies examining the dorsal visual pathway, especially area V5/MT during visual motion perception. However, despite evidence suggesting a protracted development of the dorsal visual stream, and a role of this pathway in neurodevelopmental disorders, V5/MT has not been characterized developmentally. Further, experiential factors such as reading acquisition may play a modulating role in any age-dependent changes. Here we used a coherent visual motion detection task to examine V5/MT activity and connectivity in typical participants in two studies: a Cross- Sectional Study comparing adults and children; and a Longitudinal Study of 2nd graders followed into 3rd grade. In the Cross-Sectional Study, a whole-brain analysis revealed no differences between the two groups, whereas a region of interest (ROI) approach identified greater activation in left (right trending) V5/MT in adults compared to children. However, when we measured V5/MT activation individually for each participant, children and adults showed no difference in the location or intensity of activation, although children did exhibit relatively larger extent of V5/MT activation bilaterally. There was also relatively greater functional connectivity in the children between left and right occipitotemporal cortex, including V5/MT. The Longitudinal Study revealed no changes in V5/MT activation for any measures of activation or functional connectivity from 2nd to 3rd grade. Finally, there was no evidence of an association between reading and V5/MT over time, nor predictive power of V5/MT activity for later reading. Together, our results indicate similar V5/MT activity across age groups, with relatively greater extent of V5/MT activation and functional connectivity in children relative to adults, bilaterally. These differences were not apparent over the time course of one year, suggesting that these developmental changes occur over a more protracted period.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotion PerceptionVisual CortexVisual PathwaysYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29477442
PMCPMC6042654
OpenAlexW2794650305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.