Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476912›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Simulating laminar neuroimaging data for a visual delayed match-to-sample task.

Paul T Corbitt, Antonio Ulloa, Barry Horwitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Leveraging ultra-high field (7T) MRI in psychiatric research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul T CorbittBrain Imaging & Modeling Section, National Institute on Deafness & Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Antonio UlloaBrain Imaging & Modeling Section, National Institute on Deafness & Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Neural Bytes, LLC, Washington, DC, USA.
Barry HorwitzBrain Imaging & Modeling Section, National Institute on Deafness & Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: horwitzb@mail.nih.gov.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Brain Imaging And ModelingZIADC000057 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI HORWITZ, BARRY · 2009 to 2018
$8.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DC000057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive electrophysiological and neuroanatomical studies in nonhuman mammalian experimental preparations have helped elucidate the lamina (layer) dependence of neural computations and interregional connections. Noninvasive functional neuroimaging can, in principle, resolve cortical laminae (layers), and thus provide insight into human neural computations and interregional connections. However human neuroimaging data are noisy and difficult to interpret; biologically realistic simulations can aid experimental interpretation by relating the neuroimaging data to simulated neural activity. We illustrate the potential of laminar neuroimaging by upgrading an existing large-scale, multiregion neural model that simulates a visual delayed match-to-sample (DMS) task. The new laminar-based neural unit incorporates spiny stellate, pyramidal, and inhibitory neural populations which are divided among supragranular, granular, and infragranular laminae (layers). We simulated neural activity which is translated into local field potential-like data used to simulate conventional and laminar fMRI activity. We implemented the laminar connectivity schemes proposed by Felleman and Van Essen (Cerebral Cortex, 1991) for interregional connections. The hemodynamic model that we employ is a modified version of one due to Heinzle et al. (Neuroimage, 2016) that incorporates the effects of draining veins. We show that the laminar version of the model replicates the findings of the existing model. The laminar model shows the finer structure in fMRI activity and functional connectivity. Laminar differences in the magnitude of neural activities are a prominent finding; these are also visible in the simulated fMRI. We illustrate differences between task and control conditions in the fMRI signal, and demonstrate differences in interregional laminar functional connectivity that reflect the underlying connectivity scheme. These results indicate that multi-layer computational models can aid in interpreting layer-specific fMRI, and suggest that increased use of laminar fMRI could provide unique and fundamental insights to human neuroscience.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationHemodynamicsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputational modelingCortical layersHigh-resolution fMRIHumanLaminar fMRINeural mass models

Identifiers

PMID29476912
PMCPMC5911248
OpenAlexW2789852756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.