Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476865›Full record

ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2018

Strategies to improve the regulatory assessment of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) using in vitro methods.

Anna Bal-Price, Francesca Pistollato, Magdalini Sachana, Stephanie K Bopp, Sharon Munn, Andrew Worth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pluripotent stem cells for target organ developmental toxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Organoid intelligence for developmental neurotoxicity testing.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Bal-PriceEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: anna.price@ec.europa.eu.
Francesca PistollatoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Magdalini SachanaOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2 rue André Pascal, 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France.
Stephanie K BoppEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Sharon MunnEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Andrew WorthEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Joint Research Centre · ITOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the identification of chemicals that have the potential to induce developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is based on animal testing. Since at the regulatory level, systematic testing of DNT is not a standard requirement within the EU or USA chemical legislation safety assessment, DNT testing is only performed in higher tiered testing triggered based on chemical structure activity relationships or evidence of neurotoxicity in systemic acute or repeated dose toxicity studies. However, these triggers are rarely used and, in addition, do not always serve as reliable indicators of DNT, as they are generally based on observations in adult rodents. Therefore, there is a pressing need for developing alternative methodologies that can reliably support identification of DNT triggers, and more rapidly and cost-effectively support the identification and characterization of chemicals with DNT potential. We propose to incorporate mechanistic knowledge and data derived from in vitro studies to support various regulatory applications including: (a) the identification of potential DNT triggers, (b) initial chemical screening and prioritization, (c) hazard identification and characterization, (d) chemical biological grouping, and (e) assessment of exposure to chemical mixtures. Ideally, currently available cellular neuronal/glial models derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) should be used as they allow evaluation of chemical impacts on key neurodevelopmental processes, by reproducing different windows of exposure during human brain development. A battery of DNT in vitro test methods derived from hiPSCs could generate valuable mechanistic data, speeding up the evaluation of thousands of compounds present in industrial, agricultural and consumer products that lack safety data on DNT potential.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNervous SystemNeurogenesisNeuronsNeurotoxicity SyndromesPolicy MakingQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRisk AssessmentToxicologyAdverse outcome pathwaysDevelopmental neurotoxicityHuman in vitro test systemsIntegrated Approaches to Testing and AssessmentRegulatory purposes

Identifiers

PMID29476865
PMCPMC6095942
OpenAlexW2791245151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.