ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2019
Assessing complex movement behaviors in rodent models of neurological disorders.
Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- OpenStride: an inexpensive, open-source force plate actometry system for quantification of rodent motor activity and behaviour.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Altered synaptic glutamate homeostasis contributes to cognitive decline in young APP/PSEN1 mice.Neurobiology of disease · 2021Article
- Behavioral and cognitive animal models in headache research.The journal of headache and pain · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral phenotyping is a crucial step in validating animal models of human disease. Most traditional behavioral analyses rely on investigator observation of animal subjects, which can be confounded by inter-observer variability, scoring consistency, and the ability to observe extremely rapid, small, or repetitive movements. Force-Plate Actimeter (FPA)-based assessments can quantify locomotor activity and detailed motor activity with an incredibly rich data stream that can reveal details of movement unobservable by the naked eye. This report describes four specific examples of FPA analysis of behavior that have been useful in specific rat or mouse models of human neurological disease, which show how FPA analysis can be used to capture and quantify specific features of the complex behavioral phenotypes of these animal models. The first example quantifies nociceptive behavior of the rat following injection of formalin into the footpad as a common model of persistent inflammatory pain. The second uses actimetry to quantify intense, rapid circling behaviors in a transgenic mouse that overexpresses human laminin α5, a basement membrane protein. The third example assesses place preference behaviors in a rat model of migraine headache modeling phonophobia and photophobia. In the fourth example, FPA analysis revealed a unique movement signature emerged with age in a digenic mutant mouse model of Tourette Syndrome. Taken together, these approaches demonstrate the power and usefulness of the FPA in the examination and quantification of minute details of motor behaviors, greatly expanding the scope and detail of behavioral phenotyping of preclinical models of human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.