Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476375›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2018

Perceived Access and Parental Monitoring as Moderators of Impulsivity and Marijuana Use Among Adolescents.

Amie L Haas, Byron L Zamboanga, Melina Bersamin, Travis Hyke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Which came first: Cannabis use or deficits in impulse control?Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amie L HaasPacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto University, 1791 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. ahaas@paloaltou.edu.
Byron L ZamboangaDepartment of Psychology, Smith College, 44 College Lane, Bass Hall, Northampton, MA, 01063, USA.
Melina BersaminPrevention Research Center, 180 Grand Ave., Suite 1200, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Travis HykePacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto University, 1791 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Palo Alto University · USSmith College · US

Funding

Smith College Committee on Faculty CompensationSmith College Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social and political climate regarding marijuana use has been changing in the US over the past decade. Research suggests that many adolescents report relatively easy access to marijuana and perceptions that recreational use involves minimal harm despite a growing body of research implicating the deleterious effects of use on cognitive and psychological development. Not surprisingly, prevalence rates have been rising in recent years, making it important to identify risk and protective factors associated with adolescent marijuana use. We tested a 3-way interaction model designed to (a) examine the relationship between behavioral impulsivity and marijuana use in adolescents, and (b) evaluate the roles of perceived access and parental monitoring as moderators of this relationship. High school students (N = 498, M

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorParent-Child RelationsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAdolescenceMarijuana accessMarijuana useParental monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29476375
OpenAlexW2791723501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.