Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476313›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2018

Sensitivity to Peer Evaluation and Its Genetic and Environmental Determinants: Findings from a Population-Based Twin Study.

Annelie Klippel, Ulrich Reininghaus, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Jeroen Decoster, Philippe Delespaul, Cathérine Derom, Marc de Hert, Nele Jacobs, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Bart Rutten and 5 more

Abstract readTwin Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Annelie KlippelDepartment of Neuroscience, Research Group Psychiatry, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. annelieklippel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-5368
Ulrich ReininghausDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wolfgang ViechtbauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen DecosterUniversitair Psychiatrisch Centrum, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe DelespaulDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cathérine DeromDepartment of Human Genetics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marc de HertUniversitair Psychiatrisch Centrum, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nele JacobsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Claudia Menne-LothmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bart RuttenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Evert ThieryDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jim van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ruud van WinkelDepartment of Neuroscience, Research Group Psychiatry, Center for Clinical Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Inez Myin-GermeysDepartment of Neuroscience, Research Group Psychiatry, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Marieke WichersInterdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University Center Psychiatry (UCP), Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

ERC consolidator grant ERC-2012-StG, project 309767 - INTERACTERC consolidator grant ERC-2015-CoG, Project 681466-TRANS-IDEuropean Community's Seventh Framework Program HEALTH-F2-2009-241909, project EU-GEINWO Veni grant 451-13-022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults are highly focused on peer evaluation, but little is known about sources of their differential sensitivity. We examined to what extent sensitivity to peer evaluation is influenced by interacting environmental and genetic factors. A sample of 354 healthy adolescent twin pairs (n = 708) took part in a structured, laboratory task in which they were exposed to peer evaluation. The proportion of the variance in sensitivity to peer evaluation due to genetic and environmental factors was estimated, as was the association with specific a priori environmental risk factors. Differences in sensitivity to peer evaluation between adolescents were explained mainly by non-shared environmental influences. The results on shared environmental influences were not conclusive. No impact of latent genetic factors or gene-environment interactions was found. Adolescents with lower self-rated positions on the social ladder or who reported to have been bullied more severely showed significantly stronger responses to peer evaluation. Not genes, but subjective social status and past experience of being bullied seem to impact sensitivity to peer evaluation. This suggests that altered response to peer evaluation is the outcome of cumulative sensitization to social interactions.

Indexed as

BullyingEnvironmental ExposureSocial EnvironmentAdolescentFemaleGene-Environment InteractionHumansInterpersonal RelationsMalePeer GroupRisk FactorsSelf ConceptSocial ClassTwinsYoung AdultAdolescentsBullyingGene-environment interactionsPeer evaluationSubjective social statusTwin design

Identifiers

PMID29476313
PMCPMC6133021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.