ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2018
Pregnant Women's Perspectives on Expanded Carrier Screening.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Assessing clinical education tools for expanded carrier screening.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Trial
- Scoping review and recommendations for development and delivery of education resources for reproductive genetic carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Patient and health care practitioner experiences and perspectives on expanded carrier screening: A scoping review.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Review
- Women's preferences for genetic screening in routine care: A qualitative study.Patient education and counseling · 2025Article
- Benefits and concerns of expanded carrier screening: what do pregnant Latina women in Texas think?Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Genetic Counselling Needs for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Expanded Carrier Screening in Chinese Population - A Survey on Views and Acceptance of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Commentary: Expanded carrier screening: how much is too much?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) is a relatively new carrier screening option that assesses many conditions simultaneously, as opposed to traditional ethnicity-based carrier screening for a limited number of conditions. This study aimed to explore pregnant women's perspectives on ECS, including reasons for electing or declining and anxiety associated with this decision-making. A total of 80 pregnant women were surveyed from Northwestern Medicine's Clinical Genetics Division after presenting for aneuploidy screening. Of the 80 participants, 40 elected and 40 declined ECS. Trends regarding reasons for electing or declining ECS include ethnicity, desire for genetic risk information, lack of family history, perceived likelihood of being a carrier, and perceived impact on reproductive decisions. Individuals who declined ECS seemed to prefer ethnicity-based carrier screening and believed that ECS would increase their anxiety, whereas individuals who elected ECS seemed to prefer more screening and tended to believe that ECS would reduce their anxiety. These findings provide insight on decision-making with regard to ECS and can help guide interactions that genetic counselors and other healthcare providers have with patients, including assisting patients in the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29476298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.