Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.

Angie Ambers, Jitka Votrubova, Daniel Vanek, Antti Sajantila, Bruce Budowle

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Angie AmbersCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA. angie.ambers2@unthsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-6525
Jitka VotrubovaForensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel VanekForensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic.
Antti SajantilaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Bruce BudowleCenter for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
University of North Texas · USCharles University · CZForensic DNA Service (Czechia) · CZUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 14-36938GDeadwood Historical Preservation Society NAThermo Fisher Scientific NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bones are a valuable source of DNA in forensic, anthropological, and archaeological investigations. There are a number of scenarios in which the only samples available for testing are highly degraded and/or skeletonized. Often it is necessary to perform more than one type of marker analysis on such samples in order to compile sufficient data for identification. Lineage markers, such as Y-STRs and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), represent important systems to complement autosomal DNA markers and anthropological metadata in making associations between unidentified remains and living relatives or for characterization of the remains for historical and archaeological studies. In this comparative study, Y-STR typing with both Yfiler™ and Yfiler™ Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was performed on a variety of human skeletal remains, including samples from the American Civil War (1861-1865), the late nineteenth century gold rush era in Deadwood, SD, USA (1874-1877), the Seven Years' War (1756-1763), a seventeenth-century archaeological site in Raspenava, Bohemia (Czech Republic), and World War II (1939-1945). The skeletal remains used for this study were recovered from a wide range of environmental conditions and were extracted using several common methods. Regardless of the DNA extraction method used and the age/condition of the remains, 22 out of 24 bone samples yielded a greater number of alleles using the Yfiler™ Plus kit compared to the Yfiler™ kit using the same quantity of input DNA. There was no discernable correlation with the degradation index values for these samples. Overall, the efficacy of the Yfiler™ Plus assay was demonstrated on degraded DNA from skeletal remains. Yfiler™ Plus increases the discriminatory power over the previous generation multiplex due to the larger set of Y-STR markers available for analysis and buffer modifications with the newer version kit. Increased haplotype resolution is provided to infer or refute putative genetic relationships.

Indexed as

Body RemainsMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesBone and BonesChromosomes, Human, YDisaster VictimsDNA Degradation, NecroticDNA FingerprintingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionDegraded DNAHistorical remainsLineage testingRapidly mutating Y-STRsSkeletal remainsYfiler™ PlusY-STR typing

Identifiers

PMID29476237
OpenAlexW2789543998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.