Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476093›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Zebrafish and medaka offer insights into the neurobehavioral correlates of vertebrate magnetoreception.

Ahne Myklatun, Antonella Lauri, Stephan H K Eder, Michele Cappetta, Denis Shcherbakov, Wolfgang Wurst, Michael Winklhofer, Gil G Westmeyer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heart rate control by listening to light.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Disrupted diencephalon development and neuropeptidergic pathways in zebrafish with autism-risk mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Magnetic orientation in juvenile Atlantic herring (Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Advanced visual components inspired by animal eyes.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Electrophysiology and the magnetic sense: a guide to best practice.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Magnetoreception and magnetic navigation in fishes: a half century of discovery.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ahne MyklatunInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Antonella LauriInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-182X
Stephan H K EderDepartment of Earth- and Environmental Sciences Section Geophysics, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Theresienstrasse 41, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Michele CappettaInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Denis ShcherbakovInstitute of Zoology 220, University of Hohenheim, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.
Wolfgang WurstInstitute of Developmental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael WinklhoferInstitute for Biology and Environmental Sciences IBU, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Strasse 9-11, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1352-9723
Gil G WestmeyerInstitute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. gil.westmeyer@tum.de.
TUM Klinikum · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An impediment to a mechanistic understanding of how some species sense the geomagnetic field ("magnetoreception") is the lack of vertebrate genetic models that exhibit well-characterized magnetoreceptive behavior and are amenable to whole-brain analysis. We investigated the genetic model organisms zebrafish and medaka, whose young stages are transparent and optically accessible. In an unfamiliar environment, adult fish orient according to the directional change of a magnetic field even in darkness. To enable experiments also in juveniles, we applied slowly oscillating magnetic fields, aimed at generating conflicting sensory inputs during exploratory behavior. Medaka (but not zebrafish) increase their locomotor activity in this assay. Complementary brain  activity mapping reveals neuronal activation in the lateral hindbrain during magnetic stimulation. These comparative data support magnetoreception in teleosts, provide evidence for a light-independent mechanism, and demonstrate the usefulness of zebrafish and medaka as genetic vertebrate models for studying the biophysical and neuronal mechanisms underlying magnetoreception.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDarknessLocomotionMagnetic FieldsNeuronsOryziasRhombencephalonZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29476093
PMCPMC5824813
OpenAlexW2792147506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.