Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29476016›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Doctor, Teacher, and Stethoscope: Neural Representation of Different Types of Semantic Relations.

Yangwen Xu, Xiaosha Wang, Xiaoying Wang, Weiwei Men, Jia-Hong Gao, Yanchao Bi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Chinese verb semantic feature dataset (CVFD).Behavior research methods · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The language network is not engaged in object categorization.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yangwen XuNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875.ORCID 0000-0003-1482-4927
Xiaosha WangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875.ORCID 0000-0002-2133-8161
Xiaoying WangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-9211
Weiwei MenCenter for MRI Research, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, 100871.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-6379
Jia-Hong GaoCenter for MRI Research, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China, 100871.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-0297
Yanchao BiNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100875, ybi@bnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0522-3372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concepts can be related in many ways. They can belong to the same taxonomic category (e.g., "doctor" and "teacher," both in the category of people) or be associated with the same event context (e.g., "doctor" and "stethoscope," both associated with medical scenarios). How are these two major types of semantic relations coded in the brain? We constructed stimuli from three taxonomic categories (people, manmade objects, and locations) and three thematic categories (school, medicine, and sports) and investigated the neural representations of these two dimensions using representational similarity analyses in human participants (10 men and nine women). In specific regions of interest, the left anterior temporal lobe (ATL) and the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ), we found that, whereas both areas had significant effects of taxonomic information, the taxonomic relations had stronger effects in the ATL than in the TPJ ("doctor" and "teacher" closer in ATL neural activity), with the reverse being true for thematic relations ("doctor" and "stethoscope" closer in TPJ neural activity). A whole-brain searchlight analysis revealed that widely distributed regions, mainly in the left hemisphere, represented the taxonomic dimension. Interestingly, the significant effects of the thematic relations were only observed after the taxonomic differences were controlled for in the left TPJ, the right superior lateral occipital cortex, and other frontal, temporal, and parietal regions. In summary, taxonomic grouping is a primary organizational dimension across distributed brain regions, with thematic grouping further embedded within such taxonomic structures.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualcategoryRSAsemantic relationsemanticstaxonomicthematic

Identifiers

PMID29476016
PMCPMC6596060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.