ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Patient Participation in Decision-Making During Nursing Care: A Relational Autonomy Perspective.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Considering Preference-Based Patient Participation-Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Proof of Concept for a Digital Framework to Support a Shared Agenda at Surgical Ward Rounds: Participatory Design Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Experiences and Needs of Core Participants in Surgical Ward Rounds: Qualitative Exploratory Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of SMS Ward Round Notifications on Inpatient Experience in Acute Medical Settings: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study of Patient and Interprofessional Healthcare Team Member Experiences of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds at a VA: Language, Teamwork, and Trust.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
- A Multi-Center Study on the Implementation and Challenges of Nursing Three-Level Ward Rounds in Tertiary Hospitals in Shanxi Province.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Quality improvement initiative to improve communication domains of patient satisfaction in a regional community hospital with Six Sigma methodology.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Patient Care Boards - A tool to promote patient participation during hospital ward rounds.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Patients' experiences with goal setting during initial rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury: A pilot qualitative interview study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Observation tool to measure patient-centered behaviors on rounds in an academic medical center.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Experience of hospital-initiated medication changes in older people with multimorbidity: a multicentre mixed-methods study embedded in the OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in Multimorbid older people (OPERAM) trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Article
- Creating opportunities for patient participation in managing medications across transitions of care through formal and informal modes of communication.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Health literacy in medication communication during hospital discharge: a qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The Ward Round: Patients' Perceptions of a Patient-Centered Approach and Their Suggestions for Improved Participation.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeaningful partnering with patients is advocated to enhance care delivery. Little is known about how this is operationalised at the point of care during hospital ward rounds, where decision-making concerning patient care frequently occurs.
objectiveDescribe participation of patients, with differing preferences for participation, during ward rounds in acute medical inpatient services.
methodsNaturalistic, multimethod design. Data were collected using surveys and observations of ward rounds at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Using convenience sampling, a stratified sample of acute general medical patients were recruited. Prior to observation and interview, patient responses to the Control Preference Scale were used to stratify them into three groups representing diverse participation preferences: active control where the patient makes decisions; shared control where the patient prefers to make decisions jointly with clinicians; and passive control where the patient prefers clinicians make decisions.
resultsOf the 52 patients observed over 133 ward rounds, 30.8% (n=16) reported an active control preference for participation in decision-making during ward rounds, 25% (n=13) expressed shared control preference and 44.2% (n=23) expressed low control preference. Patients' participation was observed in 75% (n=85) of ward rounds, but few rounds (18%, n=20) involved patient contribution to decisions about their care. Clinicians prompted patient participation in 54% of rounds; and in 15% patients initiated their own participation. Thematic analysis of qualitative observation and patient interview data revealed two themes,
conclusionsParticipation in ward rounds was similar for patients irrespective of control preference. This study demonstrates the need to better understand clinician roles in supporting strategies that promote patient participation in day-to-day hospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.