ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
How Should Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy Be Fractionated for Octogenarians with Lung Cancer?
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Palliative Lung Radiotherapy: Higher Dose Leads to Improved Survival?Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2020Trial
- Palliative Radiotherapy During the Last Month of Life: Have COVID-19 Recommendations Led to Reduced Utilization?In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimGeriatric oncology practice should be based on dedicated studies and real-world experience. Therefore, we evaluated survival outcomes after palliative thoracic radiotherapy in octogenarian patients with lung cancer and analyzed prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe carried out a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with a median age of 83 years. Three different fractionation regimens were compared: two fractions of 8.5 Gy, 10 fractions of 3 Gy, and higher doses than 30 Gy (maximum biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was always lower than 50 Gy). No concomitant chemotherapy was prescribed. Patients with incomplete radiotherapy (16%) were included, in line with the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. based on prescribed rather than accumulated dose.
resultsMedian survival was 3.4 months. We observed a relatively high proportion of patients who received radiotherapy in the last 30 days of life (24%). Nevertheless, approximately 10% of patients were alive 3-5 years after treatment. Prognosis was similar for those with stage III and IV disease. Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors for shorter survival: reduced performance status, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30 mg/l, leukocytosis, and prescribed radiation dose ≤30 Gy (EQD2=33 Gy). The three different radiotherapy regimens resulted in median survival of 2.4, 2.6 and 11.8 months, respectively.
conclusionSurvival outcomes were highly variable. Given that survival after 10 fractions of 3 Gy was indistinguishable from that after two fractions of 8.5 Gy, we suggest that the latter regimen should be considered for patients with poor prognosis. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should be treated with higher radiation doses, e.g. 15 fractions of 3 Gy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.