ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018
Integration of eHealth Tools in the Process of Workplace Health Promotion: Proposal for Design and Implementation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Managers' Action-Guiding Mental Models towards Mental Health-Related Organizational Interventions-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- A Practice-Proven Adaptive Case Management Approach for Innovative Health Care Services (Health Circuit): Cluster Randomized Clinical Pilot and Descriptive Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Trial
- Implementation Evaluation of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote the Use of Respiratory Protective Equipment Among Migrant Workers Exposed to Organic Solvents in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Which educational messengers do medical students prefer for receiving healthinformation? Development and psychometrics of using health messengers questionnaire.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Health, Stress and Technologies: Integrating Technology Acceptance and Health Belief Models for Smartphone-Based Stress Intervention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ethics and biomedical engineering for well-being: a cocreation study of remote services for monitoring and support.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mobile Health Requirements for the Occupational Health Assessment of Health Care Professionals: Delphi Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Telemedicine during COVID-19 Crisis and in Post-Pandemic/Post-Vaccine World-Historical Overview, Current Utilization, and Innovative Practices to Increase Utilization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the communication strategy for promoting physical activity in a cross-company network in Germany: A mixed-methods analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Use of a Mobile App for the Process Evaluation of an Intervention in Health Care: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Scoping the Need for a Tailored mHealth App to Improve Health and Well-being Behavioral Transformation in the Police: Exploring the Views of UK Police Workers via Web-Based Surveys and Client Meetings.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Consistency Between Conceptual Frameworks and Factors Influencing the Safe Behavior of Iranian Workers in the Petrochemical Industry: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2021Review
- PyFF: A Fog-Based Flexible Architecture for Enabling Privacy-by-Design IoT-Based Communal Smart Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of New Media Use on Health Behaviors: A Case Study in China.Iranian journal of public health · 2021Article
- Risk Factors and Leadership in a Digitalized Working World and Their Effects on Employees' Stress and Resources: Web-Based Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Acceptance of Personal Health Record Apps for Workplace Health Promotion: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Occupational Health Needs and Predicted Well-Being in Office Workers Undergoing Web-Based Health Promotion Training: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Determinant Factors of Public Acceptance of Stress Management Apps: Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- The Efficient Measurement of Job Satisfaction: Facet-Items versus Facet Scales.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) tools can support and improve the whole process of workplace health promotion (WHP) projects. However, several challenges and opportunities have to be considered while integrating these tools in WHP projects. Currently, a large number of eHealth tools are developed for changing health behavior, but these tools can support the whole WHP process, including group administration, information flow, assessment, intervention development process, or evaluation.
objectiveTo support a successful implementation of eHealth tools in the whole WHP processes, we introduce a concept of WHP (life cycle model of WHP) with 7 steps and present critical and success factors for the implementation of eHealth tools in each step.
methodsWe developed a life cycle model of WHP based on the World Health Organization (WHO) model of healthy workplace continual improvement process. We suggest adaptations to the WHO model to demonstrate the large number of possibilities to implement eHealth tools in WHP as well as possible critical points in the implementation process.
resultseHealth tools can enhance the efficiency of WHP in each of the 7 steps of the presented life cycle model of WHP. Specifically, eHealth tools can support by offering easier administration, providing an information and communication platform, supporting assessments, presenting and discussing assessment results in a dashboard, and offering interventions to change individual health behavior. Important success factors include the possibility to give automatic feedback about health parameters, create incentive systems, or bring together a large number of health experts in one place. Critical factors such as data security, anonymity, or lack of management involvement have to be addressed carefully to prevent nonparticipation and dropouts.
conclusionsUsing eHealth tools can support WHP, but clear regulations for the usage and implementation of these tools at the workplace are needed to secure quality and reach sustainable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.