Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29475452›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2018

Impact of the Macmillan specialist Care at Home service: a mixed methods evaluation across six sites.

Bridget Johnston, Anne Patterson, Lydia Bird, Eleanor Wilson, Kathryn Almack, Gillian Mathews, Jane Seymour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The quality of end-of-life care for Danish cancer patients who have received non-specialized palliative care: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Family caregivers' support needs during allo-HSCT-a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bridget JohnstonFlorence Nightingale Foundation Professor of Clinical Nursing Practice Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, 57-61 Oakfield Avenue, Room 61/504, Glasgow, G12 8LL, UK. Bridget.Johnston@glasgow.ac.uk.
Anne PattersonSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Lydia BirdPresent address: Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK.
Eleanor WilsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK.
Kathryn AlmackSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK.
Gillian MathewsSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, 57-61 Oakfield Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8LL, UK.
Jane SeymourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Barber House Annex, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield, S10 2LA, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Macmillan Cancer Support 2014-2106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Midhurst Macmillan Specialist Palliative Care at Home Service was founded in 2006 to improve community-based palliative care provision. Principal components include; early referral; home-based clinical interventions; close partnership working; and flexible teamwork. Following a successful introduction, the model was implemented in six further sites across England. This article reports a mixed methods evaluation of the implementation across these 'Innovation Centres'. The evaluation aimed to assess the process and impact on staff, patients and carers of providing Macmillan Specialist Care at Home services across the six sites.

methodsThe study was set within a Realist Evaluation framework and used a longitudinal, mixed methods research design. Data collection over 15 months (2014-2016) included: Quantitative outcome measures - Palliative Performance Scale [PPS] and Palliative Prognostic Index [PPI] (n = 2711); Integrated Palliative Outcome Scales [IPOS] (n = 1157); Carers Support Needs Assessment Tool [CSNAT] (n = 241); Views of Informal Carers -Evaluation of Services [VOICES-SF] (n = 102); a custom-designed Service Data Tool [SDT] that gathered prospective data from each site (n = 88). Qualitative data methods included: focus groups with project team and staff (n = 32 groups with n = 190 participants), and, volunteers (n = 6 groups with n = 32 participants). Quantitative data were analysed using SPPS Vs. 21 and qualitative data was examined via thematic analysis.

resultsComparison of findings across the six sites revealed the impact of their unique configurations on outcomes, compounded by variations in stage and mode of implementation. PPS, PPI and IPOS data revealed disparity in early referral criteria, complicated by contrasting interpretations of palliative care. The qualitative analysis, CSNAT and VOICES-SF data confirmed the value of the Macmillan model of care but uptake of specialist home-based clinical interventions was limited. The Macmillan brand engendered patient and carer confidence, bringing added value to existing services. Significant findings included better co-ordination of palliative care through project management and a single referral point and multi-disciplinary teamwork including leadership from consultants in palliative medicine, the role of health care assistants in rapid referral, and volunteer support.

conclusionsMacmillan Specialist Care at Home increases patient choice about place of death and enhances the quality of end of life experience. Clarification of key components is advocated to aid consistency of implementation across different sites and support future evaluative work.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChoice BehaviorEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPalliative CareProspective StudiesPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesComplex interventionEnd-of-life care(Macmillan) specialist palliative care serviceMixed methods evaluationPatient choice

Identifiers

PMID29475452
PMCPMC6389143
OpenAlexW2790990991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.